Calvinism, God as Father Son Word and Holy Spirit alone is God, language, lie of free will, political season attacks on Christ defended, Word of God

Notes on Job 12

by  •  • 0 Comments

Job versus the religionists/free willers..

All of Job’s friends believe that Job has done something wrong with a free will and that God is justly punishing him for that imagined offense committed in an imagined state of absolute freedom. Thus the pre-Incarnate Christ’s reply through Job: “No doubt but ye are the people, and wisdom shall die with you.” Christ/Word of God/Creating Speech speaks to Job’s friends pointing out that they know nothing of what is going on in reality, and saying without openly declaring it that their speech cannot save them and that their speech is anti-Christ/anti-Word of God/non-creating speech. There is no thought of new creation in their summations of Job or the overall situation. Indeed, the very so-called wisdom they had is absolutely predicated on the lifespan of the soul being only the lifespan of the body; it is wisdom on a timer that is not eternal wisdom and reflects nothing of eternal life except a kind of compulsory inclusion in theology to qualify one to speak on such matters in front of others with the same type of wisdom-on-a-timer.

Only Pre-Incarnate Christ through Job speaks of seeing God after death in righteousness and reflects an understanding of God far beyond his earthly friends. But to see and understand the light coming from the “despised lamp” because of the infirmity God had laid on Job by the means of Satan, would mean an end to even the pretense of having wisdom by his friends. They only have the mind of anti-Christ, of non-creation and to merely take from them the pretense of wisdom without replacing it with Christ would have made them what men call insane even compared to themselves. And they are spiritually mature in their own minds according to their beliefs.

There is a conversation between two entities in two different speaks but there is no exchange of spirit. While pre-Incarnate Christ is speaking through Job on Job’s behalf, He does not give Himself to the wicked. When He came as Incarnate, as Word-Made-Flesh, Christ did not give himself to men as well:

John 2:24,25 But Jesus did not commit himself unto them, because he knew all men, And needed not that any should testify of man: for he knew what was in man.

Job is validated as a new creature in Jesus Christ by the presence of pre-Incarnate Christ in Him, the same Creating Word that makes all new creatures in Jesus Christ. When Christ gives Himself to a fallen man, He makes that elect person a new creature. Christ and anti-Christ will never be mingled as one speech in fallen man.

James 1:18 Of his own will begat he us with the word of truth, that we should be a kind of firstfruits of his creatures.

Anti-Christ / wisdom-of-non-creation is constantly challenging Job with a accusation after accusation to see which one will “work” to get Job to lie about his own life supposedly to praise God in a false way ( to “admit” he has a free will and has used it improperly at some point and that God is merely reacting to Job’s free will and can do no other or God be supposedly genuinely “unjust” ) …as his friends constantly do with the common sense of living inside a speech/mind that never expects new creation but that relies on lack of new creation to exists as a wisdom and as a speech to declare that wisdom. ( and which God rebukes in the end : Job 42:7,8 And it was so, that after the LORD had spoken these words unto Job, the LORD said to Eliphaz the Temanite, My wrath is kindled against thee, and against thy two friends: for ye have not spoken of me the thing that is right, as my servant Job hath. Therefore take unto you now seven bullocks and seven rams, and go to my servant Job, and offer up for yourselves a burnt offering; and my servant Job shall pray for you: for him will I accept: lest I deal with you after your folly, in that ye have not spoken of me the thing which is right, like my servant Job. )

On the one hand, Job has made it to that isolated place wherein those around him are genuinely unknowing of his wisdom and he has great understanding of God that they do not and will never possess as they are so far in life. But there is more to know of the Christ whose understanding is infinite. Job’s understanding and work from the foundation of that understanding as a priest to His family has so far been concerned with “keeping clean” on this earth before God. But God already has that under control in Christ, planning already for the Incarnation of the Word of God that spoke and gave power to Job’s actual accuser in times past and whose Word creates what He says. Yet those who thought to have that power forever because of the eternal nature of God do not expect God to become flesh as Word and die, thus fulfilling His Word and ending their power as accuser and in every other way.

But Job only knows the pain of the physical torment he is suffering inside the wisdom God had revealed in that era, the early surprise and confusion of the falsely accused that matures into an understanding of the depth of cleverness and depravity of the accuser, as well as the isolation from all else because of the very wisdom he possess. And pre-Incarnate Christ will not relent for Job. It’s holy business to be conducted here based on realities and rules not yet revealed to man but demonstrated for benefit before such revelation. Not only is Job isolated, but cannot, under any reasoning or circumstances as he pleases, grant that same wisdom to his accuser, whether he loves them or not, whether the understanding will make the false accusations stop or not.

Many commentators have assumed Job spoke in bitterness “against” his accusers by saying ” you are the people and wisdom will die with you”, deriding them for having pop/mob religion. But it is just as likely Job understood they would never understand and that they would die in their sins while thinking themselves just before God …but having lied against God all their lives as their best honesty. It is just as likely that, sure, he wanted a more friendly, a more wise-without-flattery conversation but that he was essentially whispering what was to him a horror understood through suffering, having the attention focused on non-earthly, non-now stuff, understanding over-the-horizon the result of the judgment on the wicked ..on the best type of non-Christian/non-new-creature-in-Jesus-Christ friends one can have on this earth; men who by every definition of non-creating speech are honorable among themselves and wished to include Job in that honor as a favor of the wise on the ignorant they wish to elevate and do so out of their best benevolence. He is praying they be saved and they are trying to “introduce him” to the very wisdom they need saving from, but as if it were salvation and as if they were doing him a favor out of their best honesty. Job senses this and simply in resignation understands his friends can’t hear him because of their beliefs about reality compounded by his current physical ugliness. Job 12:5 He that is ready to stumble with the foot is a lamp despised in the thought of him that is at ease.

Everyone’s best honesty is on display and according to the wisdom each one has, everyone’s “motives” are perfect. But his friends do not know and cannot admit until they are told by God directly for themselves that they have lied against God and their best wisdom requires a sacrifice ( of bulls for the duration of that era..) of God as Incarnate Word/Christ Himself to get over and be just before God. They never dreamed their best honesty was a living creature that was not themselves and is their enemy; that they needed saving from the very speech they thought was the gold you go digging for in the spiritual realm.

And Job sits in ashes and sackcloth with Christ within speaking through him beyond his friends and into us whom he never knew, unable to start or stop anything but constantly accused unwittingly through his friends by the anti-Christ as if he could. If you paid him silver and gold and women he couldn’t do it faster; persecuted, he couldn’t stop. The “point” of Job’s three friends speech is that Christ through Job was a liar and that Job was deceived. The conversation goes around in circles while each man seeks the good of his neighbor not understanding the Big Picture.

Pre-Incarnate Christ, speaking of Himself as God through Job:

Job 12:13 With him is wisdom and strength, he hath counsel and understanding.

And yet

Job 12:20 He removeth away the speech of the trusty, and taketh away the understanding of the aged.

———————————

John 8:24,25 I said therefore to you, that ye shall die in your sins; for unless ye shall believe that I am he , ye shall die in your sins. They said therefore to him, Who art thou? And Jesus said to them, Altogether that which I also say to you.

In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen

Calvinism, language, lie of free will, Uncategorized, Word of God

Fundamental 【definitions / shi4ji4/释义/】 of things encountered in life usurped by the lie of free will: News

by  •  • 0 Comments

 

For 【 future/jiang1lai2/将来】 articles: I wrote in English my whole life so far and I’m turning to other tongues. That said，when I write in English these days I’m suffering from language-learning-guilt: I keep thinking I need to be writing in the other tongues and grammars.  I’m in a hurry. Not your fault..I got that. When I’m studying zhong wen/中文/Chinese I think I should be studying Русский. And of course when I’m studying Русский I think I should be studying Deutsch or Español. So it goes..

But: from now on, I’m using my English language articles to learn at least some vocabulary of other languages by inserting the words foreign language equivalent and occasionally a Chinese language construct or two. Hopefully it will help you too. But it may slow you down a bit reading the articles. Sorry about that..but when you are learning you want to run not walk, 【 right/ba/吧】? That way we both get something. Those in other tongues need to know what God has told me that I already told most of you for over a decade here or at Christian Clarity Review.

The new written [ stuff/cai2liao4/材料] I’ll ..mix it up. In the videos I’ll stick to one language. And maybe you can grow in more than way at once. That free will crap has stunted everybody.

Non-creating speech? Lie of free will…you think you’ll hide out in Chinese, Spanish, Russian or German? Not gonna happen. Tick tock…you can’t get out of being you. Those in you will be saved as God dictates. But you will burn forever in the lake of fire.

Isaiah 47:10-15 For thou hast trusted in thy wickedness: thou hast said, None seeth me. Thy wisdom and thy knowledge, it hath perverted thee; and thou hast said in thine heart, I am, and none else beside me.  Therefore shall evil come upon thee; thou shalt not know from whence it riseth: and mischief shall fall upon thee; thou shalt not be able to put it off: and desolation shall come upon thee suddenly, which thou shalt not know. Stand now with thine enchantments, and with the multitude of thy sorceries, wherein thou hast laboured from thy youth; if so be thou shalt be able to profit, if so be thou mayest prevail.  Thou art wearied in the multitude of thy counsels. Let now the astrologers, the stargazers, the monthly prognosticators, stand up, and save thee from these things that shall come upon thee.  Behold, they shall be as stubble; the fire shall burn them; they shall not deliver themselves from the power of the flame: there shall not be a coal to warm at, nor fire to sit before it. Thus shall they be unto thee with whom thou hast laboured, even thy merchants, from thy youth: they shall wander every one to his quarter; none shall save thee.

 

【Fundamental/ji1ben3/基本】  Definitions of Life 【usurped/qie4ju4/窃据】 by the lie of free will:

[News/消息/xiao1xi]: exclusive attention paid to whatever concerns having, protecting, expanding and using an idealized freedom and personal sovereignty with no regard to physical reality.

..peripheral/non-’dangerous’ “events” only understood in the utility that the new knowledge has in protecting, enhancing, honoring and worship of the idealized free will itself and the language that articulates that idealized free will… ( “[definition/释义/shi4yi4] of language” not the “[definition 释义/shi4yi4] of the tool that enables us to say “anything”, but 【exclusively/du2shu3/独属】 the specific “gestures and sounds” that declare ‘freedom of the will”)

Danger: anything that threatens the language of or understanding of [或者/huo zhe/ or] worship of an idealized free will…the ideology itself is “what needs protecting” and the danger is reduced to mere idealizations in which news can be twisted to produce “safe behaviors” that protect ONLY the future actions idealized to be possible in the idealized free will ..”saving the rest of the free will for later..” ..”until a more idealized time in which the failures of prediction of all the actions that were already supposed to be performed are reasoned away and the ideology can continue on as if nothing had happened that would dispute its relevance or veracity”.

There is no concept of what is physically happening except for what can be twisted to manufacture a rescue of the free will from any limitation and a reward for so doing given and received and new false hope of free will powered results as propaganda/da4han3da4jiao4/大喊大叫（idiom: shouting and screaming/to conduct vigorous propaganda ).

【Morality/righteousness and justice/dao4yi4/道义] is then seen as a danger to the free will ..a limitation. The [“news”/消息/xiao1xi] is then turned on its head 【from/cong2/从 being a “this is what is physically happening in the world” medium to/到/dao4 ..从。。。到 pattern .. from (time or place) ..to] a “this is how to perceive of what is happening solely with regard to protecting your idealized freedom to do 【ANYTHING/wu2lun4he2shi4/无论何事.”】 It is then [easy/容易/rong2yi4] within that medium of “protecting the free will” to turn neighbors 【against/fan3/反】 themselves [by the means of/ping2jie4/凭借】 supposedly warning of one persons possible “motives” of using their “free will” a certain way and its effect on the future use of one’s own idealized “free” will when in fact there was no danger。

A 【perfect/li3xiang3/理想】 example would be the current trend in leftist “news”/journalism circles to portray President Trump and his administration’s actions on a blow by blow basis solely in terms of how it negatively effects the idealized free will of [foreigners/lao3wai4/老外(coll. Esp. non-asian) (or) 外国人/wai4guo2ren2] who are told by those who hate their already-American-citizen neighbors that Americans really didn’t inherit The United States of America from God/Gott/El Señor/Бог/神（shen2), but that it isn’t really anyone’s country and it’s up for grabs to any foreigner to come and do as they please. The foreign free will is idealized to be a sacrosanct personification of holiness that can 【never/从不/cong2bu4, cong2lai2bu4/从来不 (or) 永不/yong3bu4..will never】be subjected to hurt feelings.

Once the free will is idealized to exist, it is a 【simple/jian3dan1/简单】thing to add an extra lie that everything has a free will .. the [ dog/狗/gou3 ], the 【 weather/tian1qi4/天气】，the【crowd/other people/qi2yu2/其余 society..she4hui4/社会】， 【“events”/事变/shi4bian4] ..in short, a “feeling mechanism” is added to every [concept/guan1nian4/观念] for the specific purpose of instilling guilt at the expense of the 【target/zhen1dui4/针对】 audience 【on behalf of dai4xing2/代行。。？？】..anything else.

The purpose of speech and language as ‘news’ is usurped in the service of a blame/guilt engine that [spews out /pen1/喷] situation after 【situation/qi4hou4/气候】 as if/in-which someone’s, anyone’s free will other than American citizen’s has been threatened and the foreign victim’s idealized-to-exist heart that is particularly sensitive to the idealization of the harmful effects of [American citizens not sustaining some injury] must be warned and protected.

【100%/di4di4dao4dao4/地地道道】of the effort of leftist news is solely based on the lie of free will and most-of /the-greater-part of 【all/alles/todas/все/全/quan2】 the news written or spoken is ‘done’ with that end in mind. The left or the right only have different emotional goals。 The left is always for anyone [except/but/apart from/除了/chu2le] those who are already-Americans, namely their neighbors, who are always idealized simultaneously ( even though it is contradictory and nonsensical ) to never use the “free” will correctly AND to have the behaviors that the rest of the world should want to 【copy/emulate/strive for/mo2fang3/模仿】。 The conservatives/”right” are just in reaction against the left from a “news” perspective and see their purpose in life as merely refuting the left. It’s not as if Breitbart or Drugde reports on NASA or hard physics except from a political perspective or has a science section..they are 【100%/di4di4dao4dao4/地地道道] a refutation engine at present.

I personally do not use the google news app 【any longer/more/bu4zai4/不再】because of the inability to filter sources: all they try to do is force 【washington post/new york times/cnn/poliico/slate/la times, /liars/tuo1kong1han4/脱空汉/лгун(“lgoon)”/Lügner/mentiroso】on you. But Breitbart and Drudge need to grow… or somebody needs to step up and be a complete news service other than just “refute the other side”. in the same non-creating speech.

Isaiah 47:7-9 And thou saidst, I shall be a lady for ever: so that thou didst not lay these things to thy heart, neither didst remember the latter end of it.  Therefore hear now this, thou that art given to pleasures, that dwellest carelessly, that sayest in thine heart, I am, and none else beside me; I shall not sit as a widow, neither shall I know the loss of children: But these two things shall come to thee in a moment in one day, the loss of children, and widowhood: they shall come upon thee in their perfection for the multitude of thy sorceries, and for the great abundance of thine enchantments.

In the Name of Jesus Christ/耶稣基督/ye1su1ji1du1/Иисус Христос/Jesus Christus/Jesús Cristo/المسيح عيسى

 

Calvinism, lie of free will

La Revolucion, la Revenge/Venganza is a whore

by  •  • 0 Comments

It begins as a conversation-in-front-of-you that those having it are having strictly among themselves and you just happen to be there. It is usually restricted to several bounds: philosophical or theological, certainly not political or having anything to do with your daily existence. It’s a what-if scenario, an interesting aside that has some eloquence, some emotional wisdom that appears unique; at least some new word orders tailored to intrigue. It is an ad for a smart-people argument in everyday terms that gives you ideas.

They are hoping you would get involved.

Perhaps it is a movie, or a song or a discussion on a talk show where everyone is certain it is true and are just wondering how to use that idea for each group or person represented. But everyone is certain it is extremely useful for personal growth and defense. And after all, its new and the people in past ages just wouldn’t understand it.

Because according to those having the conversation, those ancient people were never as smart as you.

Little do you suspect that each portion of the conversation and the thoughts you have after you have heard it are specifically tailored to entrap you within it. No matter the topic, ( even though the topic is generally about personal autonomy: used, abused or under attack ) it is most important that you have pride in order to continue being included. You have to reject God because God said pride is sin.

Even that is manufactured.

That part about you being smarter than the ancient people? Turns out another conversation is already ongoing that was had in-front-of-you in the past that pretends your personal ancestors came from apes. I’m sure you’ve heard it.

And you are smarter than an ape, right?

Whatever people believed “back in the day” (usually put as 17th century, back in Jesus’ day, , etc) can’t be true simply because they thought it ..back then. And you, by the definition of being so “evolved” must think something different. Don’t you have any pride of being “evolved”?

Suddenly, without knowing exactly how it happened, you are the one having the conversation-in-front-of to “influence” the unsuspecting. You know there are a lot of people who heard the same thing you heard and didn’t believe it and never will. But now you see them as the enemy because they are too stupid to have any pride. They certainly do not have as much pride as you. And now, because pride was well understood to be an evil tool of Satan by your ancestors, you must now think pride is great and that you have, perhaps as compared to others, “a lot more”, like a kind of money. Because you are smarter than others and hate God with smart hate.

By now you’ve had the conversation-in-front-of lots of people and had the feeling of overwhelming, entrapping others and leading them unsuspecting to your own conclusions.. er, the ones handed to you. You want to do to others what was done to you and you want to think of it as charity.

All those who had the conversation in front of you tell you how smart, how good and kind you are to entrap others the same way with the same methods you were entrapped. Now you live to do unto others what was done to you.

Misquote God. Lie a little about every little thing to get it done: to capture one more heart and one more mind.

You’ve got free will, right?

That “free will” argument that has all the “studies” to prove it exists? Bought and paid for by Foundations set up to have that conversation-in-front-of you dressed in professor-sweaters and lab coats to deceive.

So: Baby, how did they get you to carry that sign and shout? It was bought and paid for. You just go out and get the new converts and those who are the Insiders of your cause will work out the back-story later?

All those who go your way in the end come to one understanding:

From the movie (1966 ) The Professionals

“Jesus Raza: La Revolucion is like a great love affair. In the beginning, she is a goddess. A holy cause. But… every love affair has a terrible enemy: time. We see her as she is. La Revolucion is not a goddess but a whore. She was never pure, never saintly, never perfect. And we run away, find another lover, another cause. Quick, sordid affairs. Lust, but no love. Passion, but no compassion. Without love, without a cause, we are… *nothing*! We stay because we believe. We leave because we are disillusioned. We come back because we are lost. We die because we are committed. ”

Ecclesiastes 4:4 And I saw all labour, and all success of work, that it is man’s jealousy of his neighbour. This also is vanity and pursuit of the wind.

In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen

Calvinism, God as Father Son Word and Holy Spirit alone is God, language, lie of free will, Word of God

All that money you made from your neighbors and what to do? Funding the Lie of Human Free will..

by  •  • 0 Comments

edited/expanded 01/10/17

 

Say you have three new billionaires. You ask each one what they intend to do with their new wealth. You can anticipate at least part of the answers given that you have lived on this earth, have been exposed to certain norms and needs, have had desires that you at least thought when you were young that money could bring you and perhaps wanted the same for others. So it wouldn’t really be strange, though a bit disappointing to hear ( we’ll skip the hopes of the Democratic Party and Bush era judges and actually put in English ) :

First Billionaire: “A Harley! Then a house! No…three houses! And a yacht! And lobster patay for everybody! ..and ..and..cars! A Bently? What’s that expensive one..”Lamborgani”? And suits! Man, I’m gonna look great! And a vacation, clothes, jewelry and a fur for the wife! And a housekeeper for each house…full time! And a pool at each house! And..and..a freakin’ judge and senator in my pocket to keep it all goin’! Yessir, it’s gonna be great! We’ll take lessons on table manners and be perfect!”

You know you know someone like that. Perhaps more encouraging..

Second Billionaire: “It hasn’t really hit it me what having “that kind” of money means. I guess I’ll pay my debts…I’ve had some ideas about building some things. Maybe I could apply for some patents, build a company, employ some people ..provide good steady jobs for the people in my town. I’d buy my mom a new house, get her to the best doctors for her back pain. I’m sure my wife has her own ideas. But honestly, I haven’t prayed it through, so I really don’t know. I’ve got lots of ideas and hopes, but God knows what is best and what will outlast my latest desires. Because I know I can be a fool in a minute without Christ.”

Then:

Third Billionaire: “Oh I been waitin’ on this baby for years! I’m gonna buy departmental chairs at all the major universities, in the philosophy departments, in the medical schools, in the law schools and and.. I’m gonna constantly pump out paper after paper, –-peer reviewed of course—, with awards ..lots of awards ya’ see! …yeah, that what’s I’ll do ..( mumbles to himself for a while..then..) ..I’m gonna deceive them all from a young age that they’ve got free will! They’ll think it’s natural you see..I’ll buy seminaries ..give ’em a new library or something to say God forced free will on us all and the Bible says it! I’ll move whole populations over here who’s religion already says they’ve got free will and sprinkle them around the Christian neighborhoods. Hell, I’ll say anybody that doesn’t believe in free will for everybody and everything isn’t a Christian at all! I’ll have a professor that nobody dares dispute say anyone who says different has mental problems and I’ll make fun of them with newspapers and tv stations and such. And on Facebook. Haa ha ha ha ha haaaa! What do ya’ think about that! I won’t have to buy any senators. They’ll do what I tell ’em anyway. But they won’t know its me. Because of what I’ll do through the preachers and priests. They’ll be scared for their little souls if they don’t use that free will the right way! And they’ll think it was their own fault and their own idea BECAUSE they’ll think they got free will! Yeeeah. Yeeah. THAT’S what I’m gonna do ..just with the interest! (whispering now)..Just for …just for ..(heavy breathing..) starters. He he he he he…their kids ‘ll be rioting if they think somebody’s free will didn’t get what it wanted in any given instant because they’ll be lookin’ out for my lie like storm troopers lookin out for their own good…I’m gonna smash them against each other.”

Right now your thinkin’, where did that one come from? Who thinks like that?! Usually, normal, non-rich, non-Christian, yet sober citizens spend money for needs first and to be included in whatever overall construct happens to be on hand, second. Charity to them is just another way of being included ..they buy their own audience. But to buy a lie with billions of dollars whereby you destroy your neighbor while feeling superior?

Turns out that takes a Foundation. And several movie studios pumping out hero motifs. And politics. Yeah..politics.

For now let’s look briefly at the Funding of the Foundations of the Free Will Lie…and only to familiarize. To do a whole and complete list of such foundations and their “work”, in every nation and language would be at least a years worth of investigation.

If you really had free will, why would someone need to continually, on an annual basis, pay vast sums of money to constantly keep telling you “You’ve got free will!” You’ve got free will!” That would be like telling you that you had arms and legs if you really “had it anyway.” Don’t forget: You’ve got arms..AND legs! And someone should spend cumulatively, over the whole, multi-billions of dollars to keep telling you that? Why would someone, at a minimum, look as if they were trying to trick you into believing you had arms and legs?

What’s going on here? Why all the trouble?

 

 

Scratching the surface:

Every criminal and corrupt politician firmly believes in free will and their own personal autonomy. It is the common lie that the mass of the population believe in ..and not by chance. Yet what is the rhetoric of that million dollar industry to support so-called studies into free will versus determinism?

The Atlantic: There’s No Such Thing as Free Will

But we’re better off believing in it anyway. “http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/06/theres-no-such-thing-as-free-will/480750/”

“When given an opportunity to steal—to take more money than they were due from an envelope of $1 coins—those whose belief in free will had been undermined pilfered more. On a range of measures, Vohs told me, she and Schooler found that “people who are induced to believe less in free will are more likely to behave immorally.”

It seems that when people stop believing they are free agents, they stop seeing themselves as blameworthy for their actions. Consequently, they act less responsibly and give in to their baser instincts. Vohs emphasized that this result is not limited to the contrived conditions of a lab experiment. “You see the same effects with people who naturally believe more or less in free will,” she said.

And

Another pioneer of research into the psychology of free will, Roy Baumeister of Florida State University, has extended these findings. For example, he and colleagues found that students with a weaker belief in free will were less likely to volunteer their time to help a classmate than were those whose belief in free will was stronger. Likewise, those primed to hold a deterministic view by reading statements like “Science has demonstrated that free will is an illusion” were less likely to give money to a homeless person or lend someone a cellphone.

Further studies by Baumeister and colleagues have linked a diminished belief in free will to stress, unhappiness, and a lesser commitment to relationships.”

end quote.

Baumeister? Florida State University?

From: http://news.fsu.edu/news/science-technology/2016/06/21/new-funding-supports-postdoc-fellowships-research-outreach/ “New funding supports postdoc fellowships, research and outreach”

“Grants totaling more than $800,000 provided by the Charles Koch Foundation over five years, will support research relating to beliefs about free will, victimhood, personal control, and moral cultures as well as the impacts of economic, political and social institutions on the marketplace and also efforts to modernize Florida’s criminal justice and prison system. ….Baumeister, a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, recently was named one of the top 30 psychologists of the modern era by a journal of the American Psychological Association and is regularly interviewed by the world’s leading media. He was awarded the 2015 Scientific Impact Award by the Society for Experimental Social Psychology along with a colleague at Wake Forest University for their 1995 paper, “The need to belong,” which has been cited more than 10,500 times in scientific literature.”

We’ll get to the Florida State, John Templeton Foundation nexus in more detail below..

Then there is from”The Current” from UC Santa Barbara..http://www.news.ucsb.edu/2016/016512/do-we-have-free-will “Do we have free will?”

“Challenging a person’s belief in free will corrupts the more automatic and intuitive mental processes,” said corresponding author Protzko, a postdoctoral scholar in Schooler’s META (Memory, Emotion, Thought, Awareness) Lab in UCSB’s Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences. “Our study suggests that a challenge to an individual’s belief in free will can shift this default mechanism — at least temporarily — to become intuitively uncooperative and cause an individual to act in their own self-interest.”

“It’s very damaging to hear that we don’t have free will,” said Protzko.

In one of two manipulations used to determine why behavior changes when free will is challenged, the investigators placed time constraints around participant contributions to the public pot. This, in essence, influenced the players’ sense of free will. Some subjects were told they must read instructions and decide how much to donate within 10 seconds; others were told to wait 10 seconds before making their decision.

A separate manipulation was presented in the guise of an unrelated pilot study to see if reading certain passages alters mood. The passage argued that neuroscience had recently proved that our decisions, or what we perceive as decisions, are made by complex brain interactions before we have conscious access to them. Control participants read an article on whether nuclear energy is environmentally friendly.

The researchers then assessed the degree of belief participants had in free will by asking them to rate, on a 1-100 scale, their agreement with the statement, “I have free will.” Those who read the neuroscience article agreed significantly less (75.6) than those who read the control passage (86.6).

 

end quote

1.…merely reading something that disagrees with the theory of “free will”, in that else-where idealized-to-be-non-interfering-with-the-will-communication-medium called “language” ( they are saying in other places ( search “language “tool of humans” on google as of last night: 1,570,000 results (0.58 seconds)) that language is just a tool of the free will as part of the larger effort to define all of reality solely with reference to a foregone conclusion of having a free will) effects you beyond your control and that the idealized free will might not be as free as they are saying? That reading changes behavior on the sly? That the very “tool of the free will” ( they call “language”) has IMMEDIATE effects even when just read on a page? What they are admitting is that they are seeking to change YOUR behavior by you reading the article in the guise of using that idealized “non-interfering tool of the free will called language” ..on the sly.

the “intuitive processes”…? what intuitive processes are they interested in protecting against the idealized non-creating determinism that they imply is the only determinism?

…intuiting that because free will is supposedly the default condition of life as a human being, proofs can be made up that supposedly prove life …like “using money” is a proof of doing life and having freedom..and whoever controls the physical representation of the money supply and what money can buy control the ability to do those proofs….so you should intuitively be afraid of those people “them”…without their ever having said a word about it……….intuiting that if you have free will as a default state of life, then any new sin which any religion makes up can be assigned to you merely because you exist ..human caused climate change being the more foremost example as of late and that penalties should be assessed against you personally because its supposedly partly your fault.

No belief in free will, no possibility of automatically assigning guilt to you “because the earth is hurting” simply because you exist.

And the whole “several manipulations, separate manipulation” thing? They are laughing as they lie to mine and your face? What? If you tell me up front you are manipulating the whole thing ..that makes it “scientific”?

Funded by the Fetzer Institute: from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fetzer_Institute

Since its founding in 1962, the Fetzer Institute has been interested in individual and community health and wholeness, from its early days of mind-body health research to its current mission of fostering awareness of the power of love and forgiveness in the emerging global community. ..85 million in assets to do that kind of research…

Also Funded by The John Templeton Foundation:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Templeton_Foundation

they fund a LOT of papers and books that are all pro-free will:

from their wikipedia page…The Foundation’s motto, “How little we know, how eager to learn,” exemplifies our support for open-minded inquiry and our hope for advancing human progress through breakthrough discoveries..

Those that run it are evangelical Christians leaning charitable organization that give grants for investigation into lifes big questions ..like that we supposedly “definitively have free will” ..evolution is just how God supposedly made creation. Also says Templeton, Jr. always maintained that his own personal religious beliefs do not affect his ability to administer the Foundation in accordance with the wishes of his father. The Templeton Foundation has also gone to great lengths to stress that it is non-political with no bias towards any one faith…

The Templeton Foundation wouldn’t need to “side with one religion over another” since the lie of free will is a universally held belief by all pagan religions. But the whole “I’m non-partisian” is a sound-good bite of those seeking to camouflage their evil of being anti-Christ.

Word is that they support theistic Evolution in attempts to bring religion into line with the latest lies dressed as science. When viewed through that lie, “evolution is how God created the world” which directly challenges what the Word of God said of how and when God created all that is, and “evolution” becomes the substitute for and code word for God’s outright new creation. In their lie, I wasn’t born again in Jesus Christ by hearing the Creating Word of God, I’m just evolving into something else gradually for some strange reason and instant new creation by the Word of God, as God directly says is how we are born again is impossible. I have the witness within me by the holy Spirit that I am a new creature in Jesus Christ and they are basically saying that is impossible AND that they are Christians.

From their own page:

https://www.templeton.org/what-we-fund/funding-priorities/finding-free-will

  1. Where and when in evolutionary history did the capacity for free will evolve?
  2. What properties or powers had to develop for free will to be realized?

    3. If free will can be enhanced or diminished, what impact does this have on moral responsibility for our actions?

     

     

Question number 2 is a beautiful admission of exactly how the new “proofs of having done a free will act” are being planned for the future ..as in, “if you don’t do them, then you must not be alive because ( according to them..) having a free will is the default state of being human. No free will ..no proof of life. So: while you are ruminating on “what properties or powers had to develop for free will to be realized?” what you are actually doing is  giving Satan ideas on how he can kill you when you can’t prove you are using the very “properties and powers” you came up with that supposedly prove personal autonomy. 

Question number three is just “how can we blame you under any and every circumstance?”  All they have to ask next to be in full blown religious vocabulary is: “what forgiveness/penance paradigm would you suggest for enhanced or diminished free will powers” such as “we’ll let you off with a warning that you didn’t prove your free will according to the answers provided for question 2.”

 

But they did definitely left out the part where they want to pay for scientific studies to rubber stamp their agenda. …I’m not the only one saying that. 

The enemy to their dream world of universal free will for everybody, the thing they want to warn against is no-new-creation, non-creating, iron-grip-of-unchanging determinism while pretending, as they do with language, that there is only one kind of determinism, non-creating determinism and it operates within a total reality of non-creating speech.   In doing so they are keeping safe and perpetuated, that fear that drives the actions which supposedly prove life  ( and thus free will ) can be easily transferred over to the concept of determinism without those who are at present in control of the material objects by which those proofs are done losing their place.

For example: if you are in charge of the money supply, you need a certain fear in the people that they won’t get enough money to do what they need so they “can never get enough” of your product.  And when one of the “official” “proofs of life” is “spending money in front of other people”  you’ve got it made in the shade. They need your product to prove they are alive to other people..because already in the Netherlands, those who “no longer have free will” get killed. 

(from 2004…”Dutch health officials are considering guidelines doctors could follow for euthanizing terminally ill people “with no free will,” including children, the severely mentally retarded and patients in irreversible comas.”) 

Note the specific reason given for the death of the patient: “no free will”. When you are basically viewed as a battery that “runs out” of free will ( as if you had free will in the first place )  who defines what constitutes “proof of life” by doing a “free willed action” to keep from getting killed? Who controls the material, the stuff you have to do the proof with?

What is happening in front of your eyes is that an agenda to move to a “euthanasia for anyone for any reason” is being constructed via so-called “scientific investigation” that is being funded to the tune of billions of dollars per year. 

Remember that having a free will has been the ruling philosophical and theological paradigm for several hundred years and the control over vast populations by certain families has been the norm through those means. Now Calvinism is back and suddenly they need a card up their sleeve in case that goes away. A false notion of God’s pre-determination of all things is exactly what they need to keep everything intact while simply changing some verbage. 

They are not at all interested in understanding God actively creates in each and every life new things, new events and even makes us new spiritual creatures in Christ during/in-the-middle-of His overall pre-determined destiny total reality and all it contains.

Isaiah  48:3-8 have declared the former things long ago; and they went forth out of my mouth, and I caused them to be heard: I wrought suddenly, and they came to pass.  Because I knew that thou art obstinate, and thy neck is an iron sinew, and thy brow brass, so I have long ago declared them to thee; before they came to pass I caused thee to hear them ; lest thou shouldest say, Mine idol hath done them, and my graven image, or my molten image hath commanded them.  Thou heardest, see all this; –and ye, will not ye declare it ? I have caused thee to hear new things from this time, and things hidden, and that thou knewest not:  they are created now, and not long ago; and before this day thou hast not heard them, lest thou shouldest say, Behold, I knew them. Yea, thou heardest not, yea, thou knewest not, yea, from of old thine ear was not opened; for I knew that thou wouldest ever deal treacherously, and thou wast called a transgressor from the womb.

God said with Christ as His Creating Word what would happen. He caused it to happen –by speaking it. He caused you to understand He did what He said. But He also “created now and not long ago” ..He did both…determinism and new creation..Creating Determinism in which He upholds His Word in every way and yet makes a way for all of us DURING His upholding of His other determinations.

What those funding “free will research” want is a disinterested mechanic who set the course of events and there is no change or new creation DURING that overall map of where and how things are going to go. They exclusively wish an enemy-determinism, a there-be-dragons determinism to oppose to the supposed better-emotional- advantage to “wanting” a “free will” to sell death to the unsuspecting. They lie about God all the time with every breath with their propaganda to build the next totalitarianism.

They supposedly prove the existence of their desired opposite to free will by supporting propaganda dressed as science that warns everyone away from any life other than one in which free will or non-creating determinism is the default state of human beings and as such certain actions must be done to prove one is alive by the means and the material a few dictate over the many with the threat of death for not doing them and using the material and actual deaths as a result of not doing those proof of life actions well published to keep the rest in line. They are essentially saying not believing in free will makes you a criminal and/or unhappy, etc when in fact the criminals universally believe in free will and they are just one example. Clinton, Obama, Bush,..all the traitors, all the infiltrators, all the murderers, all the usurpers, every single one believes in free will. 

It is in fact the lie of free will and non-creating speech, the speech not-God, that makes criminals criminals. And those funding those studies know it. 

The visible corrupt churches job in the overall scam is to say God forced a blame paradigm on you from which you cannot extricate yourself, “free will” but that there is rescue after this life. Science’s job is to back up what the church claims from a so-called independent source. Pop culture is there to sing songs and make movie that just seem to prove that point over and over in fun ways. All of it is satanic and the common sense of non-creating speech which is the serpent speech. John Templeton Foundation? Gives away 70 million a year to fund these types of propaganda.

Yet more John Templeton Foundation work:

Alfred Mele ….funded by the John Templeton Foundation. 4.4 mil over three years… now another 4.5 million for “Philosophy and Science of Self-Control. ”..taught formerly at Davidson College. Davidson College is a PCUSA ( Presbyterian Church U.S.A ) school..( the hate Israel and homosexual Presbyterians )
Free Will: Empirical and Philosophical Investigations

from http://myweb.fsu.edu/amele/almele.html

Aspects of Agency: Decisions, Abilities, Explanations, and Free Will — (Oxford University Press, 2017)

Editor:

Seems Mr. Mele is Mr. All-Over-It. “Need another free will paper? I’m workin’ on it boss!” Mr. Bought and Paid For.

By the time you add up funding false churches to pedal the human speech / “choose Jesus” false gospel, funding the movie industry and the music industry ..particularly false Christian music and the college and university system that pumps out of false proofs of free will..and the so-called definition of language.

So I ask you: why would anyone spend millions of dollars to particularly ask questions about free will and keep coming up with the same answers over and over if not to be used as propaganda in a larger effort to control populations via the lie of human free will? If you can’t avoid having free will as they claim..at least until your battery supposedly runs out in the Netherlands or you are in the womb all over the world and cannot physically demonstrate to those outside the womb that you have free will…if you really can’t help but have free will like having an arm or a leg, why does it take multi-billion dollar industries to keep reminding you in every conceivable way? They want to define the only possible determinism from within human speech and then herd you into that non-creating determinism, that scary, no-fun scenario, supposedly chaos inducing determinism as the only alternative to the lie of free will.

To use a trucking analogy: the engine in my truck is in fact made up of a number of smaller machines. I have an engine block that is fueled by diesel. I have an air compressor that maintains the braking system. I have brakes for stopping, a computer guided acceleration and deceleration system for speeding up and slowing down, I have a transmission and a water pump, an oil cooler, a radiator, air conditioning and heating and other machines that all cooperate to produce what the truck is designed to do: move heavy loads from point a to point b.

What you are looking at as life inside the lie of free will is a multitude of small engines as lies that seem to be non-related but in fact are put together for the specific purpose to make it seem that having a free will is proved by a multitude of independent sources all diligently looking into other and re-proving they are “truth” while the whole purpose of the engine is to pump out death.

The people who believe in free will are universally the same people that are pro-abortion, pro-homosexuality, population control, “sky is falling” crowd who seek to control everyone’s behavior rigorously. The criminals, the back-biters, the usurpers, the bad kids. They are paying for “studies”, dutifully trotted out by the Left, that say even thinking you do not have free will makes you everything from a bad next door neighbor, a bad team-member, and mentally unhinged.

———————————————

Just an aside here for the sake of demonstration ( If you are a scared  sweet pea who fears what he/she reads, just keep saying “I’ll do whatever they tell me to do. I’ll do whatever they tell me to do.” … over and over to keep one hand on the lie you already know and the other foot on reality as you read. If you really have the free will to do that with and its just you inside your head, sin is not a living creature and “climate change” is  all your fault.)

A couple of fake arguments in favor of free will that are particularly popular among the religious cult of free will:

“Free will exists because love exists. No free will equals no love…”

“Love isn’t real unless its given?” Really? Even most of pop culture is a reflection of the reality that the love everyone is looking for is the love of destiny which can never depend on a free will ..that ii cannot change..its there forever.. and the so-called “on purpose love” is always, always, always..temporary.

“Heaven put us together and We were meant to be together.” is what everyone wants to see in their spouse and is repeatedly the message of the songs continually sung.

The “robot” argument ..that you would be a robot if you didn’t have free will? That’s a particular favorite of those who seek to deceive that the only alternative to the lie of fee will is non-creating determinism of an unchangeable fate and that God cannot create new things within this creation right now.

Robot? You wish. The whole goal of those in the lie of free will is that they could perfectly do all the rules and be known for it and be accusation proof and therefore guilt proof. Plainly, the closer to mimicking the idealized robotic following of rules and “not making mistakes” is what is considered the hallmark and proof of spiritual maturity among the heathen. That lack of being able to do that is the source of misery for those in the lie of free will and the foundation of totalitarianism ( .totalitarianism is a carefully crafted lie within the lie of free will…that you have a free will but can’t use it the way you want because other people have more free will than you and won’t let you…BUT..technically you have a supposed free will) .

The truth is you can never be a robot, are not expected to be a robot and that God has paid the price for your sins. After your new birth, you cannot sin, although the living creature that is sin lives in your flesh. The whole false notion of wanting to “do the rules perfectly” is based on a lie that sin is an act done with a free will.”

Everyone knows perfectly well that in any false religion, the ones who break the rules of that religion the least are held forth as the most spiritually mature. The new guys who break the rules and those looking for a better life just coming in the door are the least spiritually mature as a given. The guy who can’t break the rules is guilt free and unable to be blamed and is therefore free in a way the newbies only dream of. To be a holy robot who never breaks the rules is the ultimate dream of free willers everywhere…to be blame proof and accusation proof. That they then use a mere tone of voice to mock their personal dream on a few occasions to defend their deceptions certainly proves nothing except that the lie of free will mandates its own mockery on occasion as a deception to hide its true nature. ( and even that defintion of “spiritual maturity”/perfect-rule—follower can’t get out of the new “automatic blame” schemes wherein you are supposedly guilty of a crime ONLY BECAUSE YOU HAVE A FREE WILL ..not because of anything you did “on purpose”. Global warming? Climate change? Not good enough of a lie. It has to be “human caused” climate change to get the blame engine going. It’s your fault because you have free will at all and you are human. Without the free will part of that equation, what is the point of the argument?

The false definition of language argument: If God told you to do something, and you did not have the power to do it and yet He blamed you not for having done it, or He told you not to do something and you did not have the power to resist doing it and yet He blamed you for having done it anyway ..that wouldn’t be fair. Since God is good and fair ..we must have free will ..we must have the power within ourselves to do the good and resist the evil. Sounds good ..inside the lie of free will. But to believe it is be deceived by a pretense of actual intuition.

It is one thing to notice and understand intuitively when no one explicitly told you, that human speech doesn’t create anything; that no one can turn you into something else just by talking to you or that that lack of power to create in fact is part of a larger environment in which there is stability of being ..to “stay you”. But it is a lie to take that further and say human speech is a non-living entity that is a tool of your personal power and it is a lie to say that men, satan and God all share the same speech. Human speech is non-creating speech yet when God speaks, He creates what He says ..to include obedience in those He wishes to find faithful. God chooses who is allowed to follow His rules and whom He will turn into a new creature by speaking to them and does not choose other people. God is not begging anyone to follow His rules in order to be saved from judgment as the non-creating speech of the free will lie claims.

So: God creates His own obedience in us by His Word being One with us because He IS His Word and is not “using a will neutral means of communication.”

Are you still saying “I’ll do whatever they tell me to do.”?

 

 

 I’m proof that merely understanding God’s actual Creating Determinism in fact causes non-cooperative tendencies with lying, murdering sons-of-satan. And yet I have no criminal record. There are in fact a few people in the world who think I’m a charitable, nice guy who plays and will play on the Righteous Team, including God by the irresistible grace of God. ..that I turned out to be one of the good kids after all. So there we are. According to those warning about disbelief in free will causing criminal tendencies, and “climate change deniers being criminals”, I don’t exist.

By the grace of God, I’m definitely not one of these guys or their friend or accomplice:

Romans 1:28-32 And according as they did not think good to have God in their knowledge, God gave them up to a reprobate mind to practise unseemly things; being filled with all unrighteousness, wickedness, covetousness, malice; full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, evil dispositions; whisperers, back-biters, hateful to God, insolent, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, void of understanding, faithless, without natural affection, unmerciful; who knowing the righteous judgment of God, that they who do such things are worthy of death, not only practise them, but have fellow delight in those who do them .

In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen

Calvinism, God as Father Son Word and Holy Spirit alone is God, language, lie of free will, political season attacks on Christ defended, Word of God

Anti-Christ, his Theory of Language, Obama and Blackberry, Lime, Kiwi Diplomacy as Emotional Genre

by  •  • 0 Comments

Human speech is anti-Christ.It is not Jesus Christ, the Word of God.

Human speech is non-creating speech and instills all those inside of it with a simultaneous sense of:

1. personal power expressly because of the non-creating nature of human speech. It seems to those inside of it that they are “inside” nothing (because of the perfection-of-powerlessness nature of human speech ) but that human speech, or at least a speech with the same characteristics of powerlessness, is in fact the only language in total reality and it is a mere tool of an idealized human free will.

Let’s go over some past understands here:
a. there is no free will except for God. The illusion of free will for creatures is perfected in the powerless nature of human speech. Human speech appears to be a non-living thing because of its powerlessness and the powerlessness is THE thing in a larger environment that seems to at least logically permit “a free will”. You gotta think in a language of some sort and all you have is non-creating and therefore it seems non-interfering-with-the-will, speech. The exact powerlessness and seemingly non-interfering-with-the-will nature of human speech is turned to an emotional positive to make it appear to mandate a “free” will because the powerless nature of humans speech seems just one more nail in the supposed logical chain that gives the facade of the absence of forcing factors acting against the will. Inside human speech, all definitions of all the words and all possible “contexts” from where those definitions arise absolutely rely on the idealized non-interference principle supposedly proven by the powerlessness and are afterwards tweaked to make everything just powerless enough to be useful. It is not as if human beings or cows or any other animal to include the “telepathic aliens” run from each other on the premise that merely communicating something or receiving communication from a like creature or a strange creature is going to turn each other into another spiritual being or add extra appendages and like. They implicitly rely on the powerlessness for what they consider to be a stable environment in which to exist as a “self”. If their speech was powerful in the way that God’s Word is powerful, it appears to them there would be nothing but chaos; not even the self would be safe to keep being the self.
..which is a fallacy and slander against God as the best honesty of human beings: when one is born again in Jesus Christ, to be born again in Jesus Christ is to be taken out of human speech AND to have the Word/Speech of God as one’s new native speech; to have Creating Speech, the Big Monster the “self” was always scared it would encounter and thus “become chaotic” …and yet none of that actually happens.

and 2. (from above) fear of not being able to “fully express” the dimensions of the self while it cowers to keep itself itself. Human beings don’t do that “on purpose”, the living creature that is humans speech/anti-Christ hates God and yet can’t get out of being itself. Human fears are in large part not justifiable fears of environment, or even fears that have their origin in and about human beings but the fear of non-creating speech as it cowers from the presence of God transferred to the human heart as if it were its own.

From there the lie of free will is a gospel of envy and gossip about the supposed superpowers of one’s neighbor and fellow creature who supposedly possesses a free will and what one’s neighbor and fellow creature might do with that falsely idealized freedom. To NOT falsely idealize one’s neighbors superpowers is to reduce the possible powers each one inside human speech can have for themselves. The instant you live a private life of personal pride in supposedly being “powerful”, is the same instant the creature that is non-creating speech/anti-Christ, because of its innate powerlessness, transfers fear of God to fear of neighbor and fear of a falsely idealized  ability of a bunch of neighbors to “pool their personal sovereignty” .

The ex-political elite are proved witches and sorcerers, quite beside their overt taking part in Clinton’s necromancy or the “spirit dinners” and consuming of human body fluids mixed in with the food, abortion and homosexual behaviors in general by their attempts to cultivate and take advantage of that exact fear of the mythical “collective will” that is derived from the lie of free will and their overt support for false priest and pastors and “charities” that specifically and exclusively teach that “God forced free will on everyone and you can’t get out of it.” They take the common sense of the mind of human beings that is based on a falsely idealized lack of creation because it is inside a non-creating speech/mind and therefore perpetually limited resources and first build the target population up in pride only to simultaneously ensnare them in fear. It’s witchcraft ..it is not “ideological differences with Calvinists over how to get to the same goal.”

Not content with that much evil against their neighbors, they go so far as to heap fake awards on certain individuals in  order to drape them  in celebrity and then have those individuals put forth theories of the” origins of language” ( as if there was only one in total reality and as if God, Satan and Man all share a common speech and it can’t create anything. ) and debate between themselves stupidities that , among others, Roman Catholic press widgets then propagate.

to wit, as an example of late:

Anti-Christ through Peter Liethart, of the Theopolis Institute ( now there’s a name to inspire confidence right?) wrote a piece in First Things, the Roman Catholic philosophy rag, in which he tries to appear ignorant enough to be usefully insightful to a free willer without actually stating any truths ( as in Psalm 12:4  Who have said, With our tongue will we prevail; our lips are our own: who is lord over us? and Psalm 5:9 For there is no certainty in their mouth; their inward part is perversion, their throat is an open sepulchre; they flatter with their tongue. ) . He is, in theory, a protestant writing in a free willer mag ruminating about the origins of language and citing The Names of the Day and Yesteryear in the Field to make him seem thorough. And yet not a word in the whole article about Language called “Kingdom of Language”  even “about” Jesus Christ, the Word of God. Not even a question about how Wolfe or Chomsky’s “Universal Grammar” or Daniel Everett’s “critique” of Chomsky  and his own theory of “language is a tool humans invented” could possibly end in that speech becoming Incarnate in the flesh ..that or any speech. Obviously the “ex-missionary” and Moody Bible graduate Everett wants the fake awards and to cause mere controversy with Chomsky in an arena that has the onlookers absolutely ignoring the difference between such basics as the speech of the serpent and the Word of God, the speech of Satan that tempted the Word of God and the Word of God.

Why don’t we see such inquires? After all, First Things is supposed to be an English language jewel in the Romanists free will agenda and the players of the latest are all so-called Christians.

It is because those inquires don’t inspire unreasonable fear as seemingly “extra proofs of free will” and keep unreasonable fear as a sole option to the same minds that has been targeted to be afraid of other people’s supposed collectivizing of “personal sovereignty” into a nuclear device of ‘free will’ that will force Complicance of some arcane rules that include homosexuality and abortion.

The one rule of those rags and those players is “always play up the lie of free will both explicitly and implicitly”.

SO:  our present government having come from the pool of individuals who sat at the feet of these type of people and being inside human speech, are then tasked with explaining why they are such utter failures at Diplomacy and Business and such champions of evil. And what is their response? Essentially, to to merely point out as supposed common sense that the supposed Russian Collectivized Free Will has “hacked” ..their particular efforts at something.

Not a joke. That is the ONLY response. Not “I’m sorry.” Not “Maybe we’re not wanted and never were.”

If there was such a thing as free will, think what the Russians were thinking as they found out what the Clintons and company were really living like, whether or not they had to wait until the Wikileaks published it to find it out.

The people with nuclear weapons under their fingers were:

  1. openly claiming to talk to a dead person/necromancy ( Hillary Clinton to Eleanor Roosevelt)
  2. some guy is jacking off in the bathroom so a cook can mix his splugee in with the food for a “spirit dinner” (Podesta is then invited to partake of the food)
  3. the world can burn as long as actual citizens of their own countries are displaced by foreigners, just on principle,  babies are killed and homosexuals can hold hands and one of them think of himself as “the wife”.

And its true and the Democrats have never even one time denied it. They just got mad it made public.

And yet they call North Korea “crazy” who almost has nuclear weapons that can strike the west coast of the United States? What’s the crazy part compared to themselves? He openly calls himself a god and North Koreans are forced to pray to him?

Wouldn’t you do something if you could to head off a nuclear holocaust from an enemy that was just ..lost in the head?

I don’t think it was the Russians. But it would certainly make sense if they did and they did us a favor if it was them. It’s probably not and they showed grace from God through them not to retaliate.

And the response by Obama and Company: one from column A and 2 from column B to mix and match emotional flavors on their way Out. Hate Israel, Hate losing, hate Trump, Hate Actual America, Love the Legacy and all of it as worshiping the lie of free will and anti-Christ.

As he takes the Big Bird Out of the White House they can insolently debate “Everetts theory of speech as a tool vs Chomsky’s Universal Grammar” and scratch their chins thoughtfully as they chew on some splugee cake. And maybe some Blackberry/Lime/Kiwi selzter water to wash it down. Zero calories, zero salvation, zero righteous accomplishments, ..zero discount to the tax payers for the plane ride. Someone from First Things or the Theopolis Institute is no doubt mumbling something about them to Mary.

Psalm 5:4-6 For thou art not a *God that hath pleasure in wickedness; evil shall not sojourn with thee. Insolent fools shall not stand before thine eyes; thou hatest all workers of iniquity. Thou wilt destroy them that speak lies: Jehovah abhorreth a man of blood and deceit.

In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen