Plus first edit:
The Lie of Human Free Will and Non-creating determinism forces Greed, Avarice and Immorality as Common Sense
Psalm 35:19,20 Let not them that are mine enemies wrongfully rejoice over me: neither let them wink with the eye that hate me without a cause. 35:20 For they speak not peace: but they devise deceitful matters against them that are quiet in the land.
The lie of free will is not spoken in a vacuum. It is non-creating speech/human speech through the mouths of human beings, the tongue set on fire by hell itself, as a device that is a lie predicated to be used as a precursor tool for the introduction of more lies. Even the newest newbie of the lie of free will is deceived that in the lie, which they think is true, they need ‘more’ words that bring a ‘deeper understanding’ of ‘what to do’ with a supposed ‘free’ will. Every false religion has its own ideal behaviors as religious rules, a forgiveness paradigm of some sort for the restoration of the one who supposedly breaks the rules ‘on purpose’ and a reward system for supposed ‘growth’ and ‘maturity’ on the path toward the ideal after-death destination.
It’s the in-between now and then that catches them in death.
In between the idealized what-is-happening-now and the ‘holy destination’ of false religions, an idealized free will must be demonstrated and continuously proven to exist in order to participate in the false religion: the deceived one must be seen ‘doing’ something and the something they must be seen doing must, at least as a large percentage of the number of behaviors, fall within the parameters of the groups ‘plan of earned salvation’. The non-creating speech of the false religion is never investigated as to its essence ( what is it?) but is always seen as another ‘special’ part of human speech that is necessary to read/hear for one’s supposed salvation. So while the adherent is told what to do and is developing a desire to do exactly as told with a ‘free’ will so as to earn a blame-proof life and end up, in the best free will theory of what to ‘be’, a righteous robot always ‘doing the behaviors’ perfectly, he/she is actually being filled with demons/spirits of destructive behaviors the more they hear the rules and rewards and admonitions of the false religion. The words of non-creating speech/lies are living creatures/spirits.
At this point, the false religion is easily seen as an economic attack on other false religions: it merely has new material items and behaviors with those material items as a part of its ‘plan of salvation’. New items must be purchased and old items rejected. The whole time the doing of specific behaviors that supposedly constitute ‘proof’ of having a free will at all is mandatory else the new adherent is condemned. Yet the most persuasive behaviors of supposedly having a free will to the deceived are specifically those that violate the rules of the false religion as they seem to demonstrate a total freedom from constraint and a ‘free-er’ free will on the one hand and a supposed proof of righteous intent as proving an inward religious struggle on the other. The ‘free-est’ free will in the mind of the deceived is then the most wicked, the biggest and most often transgressor of the ‘rules’.
The more false religions proliferate, each with its own ideal behaviors of both salvation and damnation, the more material items are necessary to have under one’s use in order to prove the ‘free will’ exists. The proofs of having a free will are universally accepted across all religions regardless of the competition between them for adherents and each violation of one false/free will based religion’s behavioral model versus another is met with condemnation with regard to idealized progress on a ‘journey to paradise’ but universal acceptance with regard to all shopping at the same stores, only each for his/her own necessary items with which to prove their own version of an ideal life lived with a ‘free will’.
The proliferation of false religions, to include false Christianities, is then well understood to be nothing more than a boon to mercantilism, as many more things are bought and sold than are necessary for life or even comfort, and trade, buying and selling is almost a universally accepted ‘behavioral proof’ of having a ‘free will’. Each false religion has its own proofs of behavior and material items the behaviors need in order to be exercised. Since one never knows, in the vagaries of life, when all such deceived persons are mixing and milling around in public ‘doing’ their respective ‘proofs of free will’ what one will encounter next, they all want to have on hand a way to prove free will –to anybody, at any time. A working definition of a wealthy person is then one who has lots of ways to prove they have a ‘free’ will and is ‘safer’ than a ‘poor’ person in that regard, and the poor is one who has relatively few ways to prove a ‘free’ will and is in ‘danger’ depending on whom they meet with their required proofs of life in their mind. The collection then of otherwise useless material objects as is commonly seen with both ‘rich’ and even homeless ‘shopping kart’ people is understood to be the proofs of fear of each other’s version of ‘proving ‘free’ will’, with the rich as the biggest suckers as they work only to collect more while God prevents the poor from doing so on a larger scale.
Proverbs 18:11,12 The rich man’s wealth is his strong city, and as a high wall in his own imagination.18:12 Before destruction the heart of man is haughty; and before honour goeth humility.
Those with the most stuff feel strong and safe in the lie of free will. Those with less feel weak and vulnerable in the lie of free will.
Proverbs 10:15,16 The rich man’s wealth is his strong city; the destruction of the poor is their poverty. 10:16 The labour of a righteous man tendeth to life; the revenue of a wicked man , to sin.
Each time a deceived person buys or sells, they want to be seen as ‘proving life’ because they well understand in that deception and across all social structures and ‘cultural differences’, that regardless of false religious affiliation, supposedly having a free will at all is required to be seen as human. The dogma that having a free will is intrinsic to human beings and that one couldn’t get rid of free will even were they to so desire it is a universal of all false religions, regardless of whether they mix in some non-creating determinism like Buddhism or other false reincarnation religions wherein the free willed actions of a supposed past life dictate what one is now and the various emotional opportunities one can possibly have. Without seeing some minimum ‘proof of free will’, the larger populace, no matter the particular false religion they adhere to, because they are deceived they have a free will as the default state of being human, will relegate those individuals to non-or-sub human status.
The perceived need for the material objects with which to prove one has a ‘free’ will in front of others who are equally deceived the free will exists leads to lust and panic as greed for the greatest variety of material objects for which one would have no other need.
The panic to obtain and the competition for those items, while there is an attempt to have an etiquette about it or rules of behavior as to how one ‘fairly’ obtains such items that provide the ability for such proofs, mandates its own illegality as to how those items and education and everything else that may be necessary in any given instant to prove your free will to the other guy are obtained.
Idealized models of behavior, whatever they may be, no matter how obvious the benefits to one’s life, must be trampled upon on the principle that the maximum idealized freedom of the lie of free will is best demonstrated and most persuasive as projecting power against one’s deceived neighbor who believes they have free will as well only and solely when behavior is demonstrated to be constantly outside those expected norms and rules. Young people are rebellious for exactly that reason: they are forced to ‘demonstrate’ power in the overall lie of free will else be excluded from a public perception of ‘sanity’ and inclusion. Competing brands of the lie of free will with their various proofs of life as equating having a free will as the default state of being human at all and thus needing to supposedly prove being alive as an idealized ability of doing the various proofs of having a free will force a panic in those deceived they have free will that is a fear of others who believe exactly the same things. Each one becomes the unspoken police state of the other and the totalitarian mindset of each other against his and her neighbor, even as they all seek to escape any boundaries which might even in theory limit an ability to demonstrate the maximum idealized freedom of the lie.
They all shop at the same stores or display what they have bought online for the same reasons: to be seen ‘proving’ they supposedly have free will to each other. The fact that they do not is part of their salvation if they are granted that God.
This is true regardless of one specific economic model as opposed to another: everywhere the lie of free will is believed, from false Christianity to more openly pagan religions, no matter the name or title, whatever method or material objects are used in trade, the purpose for most of the trade at all is simply to accumulate a critical quantity/mass and variety of items with which to be able to prove one is alive and powerful per the intricacies of any brand name of the lie of free will one might find oneself in at any given moment.
Ancient Israel lived that same existence and God destroyed them for it, as lifting up a nation and then abasing it:
1Samual 2:7-9 Jehovah maketh poor, and maketh rich, he bringeth low, also he lifteth up: 2:8 He raiseth up the poor out of the dust; from the dung-hill he lifteth up the needy, To set him among nobles; and he maketh them inherit a throne of glory; For the pillars of the earth are Jehovah’s, and he hath set the world upon them. 2:9 He keepeth the feet of his saints, but the wicked are silenced in darkness; for by strength shall no man prevail.
They had no end of treasures ( material items ) , new religions ( new behavioral models to free them from the old ones who already had established leadership, tyrannies, etc..) and what was seen as military strength of their day for the very reason to ‘prove’ personal strength/’free will’ to anybody anywhere at any time as their free willer common sense.
Isaiah 2:6-8 For thou hast cast off thy people, the house of Jacob, because they are filled with what comes from the east, and use auguries like the Philistines, and ally themselves with the children of foreigners. 2:7 And their land is full of silver and gold, and there is no end of their treasures: their land also is full of horses, and there is no end of their chariots. 2:8 And their land is full of idols; they bow themselves down to the work of their own hands, to that which their fingers have made.
Other than absolute and true new birth in Jesus Christ, wherein one’s being is changed to accommodate the new spirit and new Speech from God and to be a dwelling place for God Himself as a temple, so-called ‘changing religions’ or ‘mingling different faiths together’ is a farce when seen as the situation really is: they really worshiped human speech/non-creating speech all along and its lie of human free will. So-called ‘changing religions’ was/is nothing more than rotating to the easiest economic model of how to obtain the required items to ‘prove the free will’ with and remain ‘safe’ in a larger population of free willers.
(The thriftiest religion usually wins. True Christianity is free. You don’t need anything else but God in Jesus Christ. You can’t prove it in front of someone else because God has to be your witness –not men.)
The panic-to-prove free will in front of other deceived people who think free will is real is exacerbated by various propaganda/meta-theater news items put out in the pervasive non-creating/human speech of mankind such as euthanasia laws now permitting and even mandating the so-called ‘mercy killing’ of those deemed to have had more free will in the past but having been in an accident or merely gotten older now have less free will. Most particularly those news items on that subject with the inclusion of the phrase “no longer have free will” or “people with no free will”.
http://edition.cnn.com/2004/HEALTH/12/01/netherlands.mercykill/
“The Royal Dutch Medical Association (KNMG) has asked the Netherlands Ministry of Health to create an independent board to evaluate euthanasia cases for each category of people “with no free will.” ”
That was in 2004. One can only imagine the sheer number of undesirables that might be categorized as having “no free will” in comparison to the larger population of persons who are continuously and freshly deceived that free will exists at all on a constant basis by those paid to make them so deceived. It is very easy to see that such designations are intended to spark fear in the minds of the general populace over supposedly “losing” free will by some circumstance or even losing the material and variable wealth by which they could have traded in order to keep proving they had free will in front of such an “independent board”. What new category will be next? Might they merely start with the easy targets of children, those in the womb and those in coma’s or the very aged and then move on to such general groups as “the poor” or “the ignorant” who don’t share the ideology of ‘free will’, or who through ignorance don’t know to be greedy and immoral and so can’t prove their “own free will” as vigorously as those who are them most greedy and the most immoral?
Of course they will.
Because inside the lie it all makes sense for self-preservation: kill the other free willers before they kill you; before they ‘decide’ that you are a slight impediment to the expression and proof of them having a free will and are accumulating the material objects and ‘influence’ that should have gone to them were you not there or having done the flagrant immorality as supposedly proving their own will was supposedly ‘free-er’ than the moral. And of course another category would have to be those who object to the gross immorality and would seem to those inside the lie of free will or the non-creating ‘determinism’ that would constrain the idealized boundaries and absolute necessity of ‘doing the proofs’–at all. To a free willer, being moral is nothing more or less than helping a worship of the lie on behalf of someone else: if one has a flat tire, it helps out the overall lie of free will for another free willer to stop and help fix it accompanied by the usual expressions of gratitude one free willer must give another at the slightest favor. If there seems to be no recognition of having one’s free will aided by another, then that supposed lack of doing what to a free willer is mandatory behavior and speech patterns is slap in the face to the lie itself, an affront to the idealized dignity of the lie of free will as a living spirit.
Here, a 29 year old otherwise perfectly healthy adult drinks poison and dies after saying:
https://www.bbc.com/news/stories-45117163
“I’m 29 years old and I’ve chosen to be voluntarily euthanised. I’ve chosen this because I have a lot of mental health issues. I suffer unbearably and hopelessly. Every breath I take is torture…”
By the numbers:
1. they constantly preached as dogma to her that “God forced free will on people! You can’t get out of it!”
2. she was deceived what they said was true: that all human beings have a free will as the default state of being human
3. she witnessed the lie constantly in the lips of the rich and successful yet she was unable to replicate what they had supposedly done in her life: she was deceived her “personal power” had a broken leg or a wing and so would never be able to compete, that all the ‘other people’ got to do as they pleased and so were successful while she was held back by some unknown ‘x’ that white, free willer witch doctors told her was ‘mental illness’. They never told her that free will was an outright lie, but that it was all true and in some strange way, she was different than everyone else; essentially that she was sub-human and that with this last act of a ‘free will’ she could make up her former lack of thankfulness, correct praise and glory for the deity of ‘free will’ everyone else had perfected …if she did it publicly and got in all the news outlets. That way they could make use of her as a tool to deceive others that they weren’t being murdered by trickery, but that it was ok to just say no to ‘freedom’ and be killed as supposedly admitting sub-human status.
4. She never noticed the glaring holes and open inconsistencies in the lie for what they were and if she did ask about a detail that bothered her was told it was her ‘mental illness’. Being constantly warned about the fake bogeyman of ‘determinism’ that was defined for the purpose of simply being an adversary to the glory of ‘freedom’ and being constantly ‘welcomed back into’ the fold of the lie of free will, from within the free will lie that she and her parents and her friends and everyone she met constantly spoke, “she had no choice” but to believe them. First they said she had free will and couldn’t get rid of it by the will of God or evolution or whatever; then they said it was on a timer and she could lose it or someone else ( or ‘determinism’) could steal it; then they told her she had peculiar fear –only her– that nothing was as they described it.
5. She never guessed that the opinion that she had free will by herself and others was not at a common sense natural to people, but was bought and paid for by such organizations as the John Templeton Foundation, who pump billions of dollars into funding everything from conferences to philosophical chairs in philosophy departments to changing seminary degree requirements to reflect a more free will friendly theology from the pulpit. Or that marketing campaigns in many versions of human speech who make out that to buy their product results in an expression of free will ( ‘thank you for choosing us!, etc..) and therefore ‘happiness’ ( after all, the people who ‘choose to buy’ their products are always smiling ..) never had the good of their customers in mind but had overt motives to enslave the populace with desires of constantly expressing a supposed free will by buying more stuff than they need. Women and children in particular fall for that lie, but by no means are men excluded.
6. she worshiped the lie of free will and the sorcerers who murdered her to her last breathe and died a saint in the pantheon of the lie of free will the exact same as the virgins of yesteryear’s false religions were tricked into volunteering to be killed to save the harvest or the tribe or bring back the buffalo: the merchants and false teachers needed an example for the rest of the herd to scare them into buying more and more material objects and buying more and more ‘education’ on how to use them to ‘prove free will’.
More from the same story:
“In many ways her story is uniquely Dutch. Euthanasia is against the law in most countries, but in the Netherlands it is allowed if a doctor is satisfied a patient’s suffering is “unbearable with no prospect of improvement” and if there is “no reasonable alternative in the patient’s situation”.
People who want to die because they are deceived they can’t keep up to everyone else’s supposed super-powers strangely don’t commit a quiet suicide under the new Dutch laws: they want to force the public to take part in their death as emotionally training the public that there is no alternative to the lie of free will or non-creating determinism and thus teach there is “no reasonable alternative in the patients situation” and so on to the next gaslighted ‘patient’. And of course, if the Dutch will do this to themselves, then the rest of the world has no hope if the Dutch have any say in the matter in the EU or the U.N.
It is much better in the eyes of public murderers and deceivers for a few at the time shown in newspapers and news outlets to get killed over deception than to give up the lie of free will. It is the very lie of free will that drives what merchants and teachers call the ‘economy’ that they love; not the actual economy of need but an economy of fear based purchasing and behaviors and speech patterns that mandates having every possible trade item, every different educational angle and understanding every possible emotional angle in order to prove free will in any given instance..just to stay alive, to defend oneself from one’s neighbors grasping at and demanding from others fake proofs all of the sudden. The demand of obtaining lies is always more validation of the lie; the more unique the validation, the more ‘powerful’ one supposedly is and the more one’s neighbor is jealous of that supposed ‘power’/uniqueness.
In addition to the accumulation of varieties of unnecessary material things with which one might be called upon to ‘use’ or trade in order to prove one is an actual human being by supposedly proving ‘free will’ in that use or trade, the lie of free will in every way seeks to portray that new life created out of life, such as pregnancy and birth of children –at all–, not just the “ones with no free will”, will be a constant impediment to both the accumulation of material things with which to prove one is worthy of life as being justly called a human being, but also to their use. Those who define what the “proof of having a free will” actually is, the priests and priestesses of the Lie of free will are seen as ‘the powerful’ by the deceived and their sole job in life is to scare others into frequent trade and accumulation of material items and to formulate laws to protect such accumulation as lifestyle no matter other consequences.
It simply does not matter how righteous or equitable some supposed economic model may actually be; once it falls under the umbrella of the lie of human free will or false/non-creating determinism it becomes the very instrument of destruction of all those within it. So appealing to one vs another is complete farce. It’s a nice sentence from an emotional point of view as virtue signaling to say something like “belief in free will drives economic inequality” or “belief in determinism drives economic inequality” yet there is no truth in either one as both are simply an appeal to keep the economic model that is the foundation of those studies no matter what they may be or in what religion they are as fostering panic trade for the same reasons. The sheer amount of unnecessary trade going on makes no sense without the lie of free will. Non-creating determinism is the standard model against which to judge ‘free will’, yet it is constantly simply called “determinism” as if that were the true creating determinism of God’s predestination and election. The whole point of such comparisons is to define God out of the human vocabulary so that men will just supposedly ‘pick’ a favorite paradigm and stick with it to increase trade. Philosophical ‘tests’ and ‘research’ on the economic impact of something like “free will vs determinism” ALWAYS focus on emotional manipulation and feelings as the proof of one side vs the other in those arguments and change nothing. The determinism to which they appeal or vilify is never actual creating determinism in which God creates new things all the time and makes sure His children get them on time exactly when they need them while making sure the pre-determined end of all things is exactly what He has already said, but the determinism that arises out a falsely idealized ‘necessary opposite’ against which to pit ‘free will’ and in such a way as to always make the opposition against a dogma of ‘free will’ out to be pointless at the least and detrimental at worst at the behest of merchants.
Here is an example of fake science being paid for by the John Templeton Foundation, a constant stalwart of Satan in Satan’s war against Christ, Christians and the human soul in general, of his war from within non-creating speech against Creating Speech/Jesus Christ. In the article is a good summation of how manipulative the ‘science’ has been and for what purpose: John Templeton Foundation pays its employees/grantees tens of millions of dollars to constantly shore up the failing reputation of the lie of free will and to supposedly find ‘fresh evidence’ of the existence of free will as a clever way to keep the Unnecessary Economy going. So evil are the hoards of Templeton employees/grantees that they are not content to merely claim free will for mankind, but go further and claim that to even think about determinism and that there might be no free will at all is detrimental to the economy, to workplace ethics, the ability to learn and moral behavior. On a certain level, at least they are honest in a small way as to why they lie: to keep a false, bloated economy going that encourages greed, avarice and jealousy as common sense. And they do this with ridiculous ‘tests’ they simply claim are ‘science’. Vohs, Schooler and Baumeister are all Templeton stooges as are most pro-free will writers of academic social science papers. If you believe in free will, your ‘opinion’ on that has been bought and paid for by the John Templeton Foundation, among others who have spent, by now, at least hundreds of millions of dollars all over the globe, but particularly in English speaking countries to promote that one lie. They are a principal agent being used by non-creating speech to spread itself and its common sense.
From: ‘Irresponsible and a Disservice’: The integrity of social psychology turns on the free will dilemma by J.B. Miles
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3757306/
“Over the last few years, a number of works have been published suggesting both the putative prosocial benefits of belief in free will and the possible dangers of disclosing to the public doubts about the existence of free will. The names turning up most regularly as lead authors include Roy Baumeister and Tyler Stillman at Florida State, Kathleen Vohs at the University of Minnesotta, Jonathan Schooler and Azim Shariff at the University of British Columbia, and Daniel Wegner at Harvard. Baumeister has suggested that belief in free will reduces aggression and promotes selflessness (Baumeister, Masicampo, & DeWall, 2009). Vohs, Schooler, and Shariff have argued that disbelief in free will encourages cheating and undermines moral behaviour (Shariff, Schooler, & Vohs, 2008;Vohs & Schooler, 2008). Stillman, Baumeister, and Vohs have asserted that believers in free will make better employees (Stillmanet al., 2010).Stillman and Baumeister (2010) argue that belief in free will facilitates learning from emotional experiences while disbelief in free will reduces learning. And Wegner (2002) claims belief in free will is necessary for the sense of responsibility that underlies all morality.
In addition to asserting the putative prosocial benefits of belief in free will, such studies have often suggested that it is dangerous to disclose growing reservations about the existence of free will, and John Bargh at Yale has expressed disquiet about social psychologists potentially seeking to restrict such information. In an exchange with Roy Baumeister in the online blogs of Psychology Today, Bargh described what he called the ‘Vohs–Schooler–Baumeister’ concern to stay silent on doubts about the existence of free will as ‘irresponsible and a disservice … to the general public’ (Bargh, 2009). Bargh has furthermore noted that promoting the putative existence of free will in the absence of any objective evidence risks linking social psychology with the mystical.
For example, the Vohs–Schooler–Baumeister studies all appear to be linked by a fundamental methodological error that suggests that – irrespective of the separate question of suppressing knowledge – their putative findings may be spurious. Furthermore, the psychological literature appears almost wholly unaware that the possible existence of free will has already been disproved by logical philosophers. And it has long been recognized by certain scientists, legal theorists, and philosophers that far from having prosocial benefits, belief in free will acts to discriminate against the poor and racial minorities, may make justice impossible and even encourages contempt for and violence towards the weak. For example, research by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation has found that between 69% and 83% of Britons think that virtually everyone remains in poverty in Britain through choice, and that this belief in poverty-through-choice meant that respondents had become almost completely indifferent to the plight of the poor (Bamfield & Horton, 2009).
It needs to be mentioned that those in that paper objecting to the manipulative fake science promoting ‘free will’ such as John Baugh are non-creating determinists, not believers in Jesus Christ and God’s predestination and election and who for the most part have probably never even heard of the difference between human speech/non-creating speech and the Creating Word/Speech of God and can’t believe it if they did except for the grace of God on them. No one is saved with ‘information’. Most all social ‘scientists’ are either agnostics or atheists, which is just as bad as the lie of free will. But at least even they see the blatant manipulation, greed, corruption and avarice and outright fabrications/lies that the other wicked persons of this world have to resort to in keeping the lie of free will alive and its economy of unnecessary trade alive even one more day.
Mystery Babylon is the source of the lie of free will and is non-creating speech. When the lie of free will is gone –in total, not just a supposed ‘weaponized version’ of it, – the false economy it created will collapse and merchants will then mourn over it.
Revelation 18:11-13 And the merchants of the earth weep and grieve over her, because no one buys their lading any more; 18:12 lading of gold, and silver, and precious stones, and pearl, and fine linen, and purple, and silk, and scarlet dye, and all thyine wood, and every article in ivory, and every article in most precious wood, and in brass, and in iron, and in marble, 18:13 and cinnamon, and amomum, and incense, and unguent, and frankincense, and wine, and oil, and fine flour, and wheat, and cattle, and sheep, and of horses, and of chariots, and of bodies, and souls of men.
In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen