You cannot get out of the Lie itself or consequences of the Lie of Human Free Will or the coming wrath of God on sinners from inside Human Speech or with Human Speech.

Plain. Simple. There it is.

You have to step outside human speech. Period. And you can’t do that with human speech no matter what you say or how you say it. That speech in man has used every combination of physical rituals (that combination of rituals and speech are called religions..) ( from special clothing, special signs in the air with hands, dances, powders, incense, gold, silver, paint, blood of children, to the blood of adults, from forest items to tech items to animals…everything ) to empower itself and has failed. The world is littered with the relics and ruins of past false religions that no one can speak any more.

The speech that is a spirit that is in human beings they got from the serpent in the Fall of Man. Our native speech was pre-Incarnate Christ/Word of God in the Garden of Eden. With the Word of God, Adam guarded the Garden. The Fall of Man was the acquisition, through treachery of the serpent and at the express counsel of God, of serpent speech/non-creating speech/anti-Christ as the new native speech for Man.

Pre-Incarnate Christ Jesus/Word of God/Creating Speech through Adam:

Genesis 2:23-24 And Man said, This time it is bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh: this shall be called Woman, because this was taken out of a man. Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and cleave to his wife; and they shall become one flesh.

But in the switching of languages, Man has lost the ability to hear God unless God specifically gives it to those individuals.

John 14:16-17 And I will beg the Father, and he will give you another Comforter, that he may be with you for ever, the Spirit of truth, whom the world cannot receive, because it does not see him nor know him; but ye know him, for he abides with you, and shall be in you.

Why can’t the world receive the spirit of truth? Because they cannot hear him but are deceived that there is really only one speech in total reality…that there is no other speech than human speech or a speech with the characteristics of human speech, namely that it can’t create anything, can’t call anything into being from nothing, and so gives those in it a mindset and emotional set of constant limited resources and disbelief in God. God tells them the truth constantly, but He cannot make sense to them because they have a speech in them that hates God and sees things only in terms of a constant lack of new creation.

1Corinthains 2:11-16 For who of men hath known the things of a man except the spirit of the man which is in him? thus also the things of God knows no one except the Spirit of God. But we have received, not the spirit of the world, but the Spirit which is of God, that we may know the things which have been freely given to us of God: which also we speak, not in words taught by human wisdom, but in those taught by the Spirit, communicating spiritual things by spiritual means . But the natural man does not receive the things of the Spirit of God, for they are folly to him; and he cannot know them because they are spiritually discerned; but the spiritual discerns all things, and he is discerned of no one. For who has known the mind of the Lord, who shall instruct him? But we have the mind of Christ.

In addition to that lack of ability by Man to hear God, God takes away sometimes the ability to hear Him as Word to those He has given it to:

Amos 8:11 Behold, days come, saith the Lord Jehovah, when I will send a famine in the land; not a famine of bread, nor a thirst for water, but of hearing the words of Jehovah.

Afterwards, Christ comes in flesh, the Word of God incarnate and only those the Father specifically wants to hear Him can know Him for Who He is.

Matthew 16:13-17 But when Jesus was come into the parts of Caesarea-Philippi, he demanded of his disciples, saying, Who do men say that I the Son of man am? And they said, Some, John the baptist; and others, Elias; and others again, Jeremias or one of the prophets. He says to them, But ye, who do ye say that I am? And Simon Peter answering said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God. And Jesus answering said to him, Blessed art thou, Simon Bar-jona, for flesh and blood has not revealed it to thee, but my Father who is in the heavens.

Witness the common sense of religionists in human speech versus the Incarnate Word of God:

John 6:42-66 And they said, Is not this Jesus the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we have known? how then does he say, I am come down out of heaven? Jesus therefore answered and said to them, Murmur not among yourselves. No one can come to me except the Father who has sent me draw him, and I will raise him up in the last day. It is written in the prophets, And they shall be all taught of God. Every one that has heard from the Father himself , and has learned of him , comes to me; not that any one has seen the Father, except he who is of God, he has seen the Father. Verily, verily, I say to you, He that believes on me has life eternal. I am the bread of life. Your fathers ate the manna in the wilderness and died. This is the bread which comes down out of heaven, that one may eat of it and not die. I am the living bread which has come down out of heaven: if any one shall have eaten of this bread he shall live for ever; but the bread withal which I shall give is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world. The Jews therefore contended among themselves, saying, How can he give us this flesh to eat? Jesus therefore said to them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Unless ye shall have eaten the flesh of the Son of man, and drunk his blood, ye have no life in yourselves. He that eats my flesh and drinks my blood has life eternal, and I will raise him up at the last day: for my flesh is truly food and my blood is truly drink. He that eats my flesh and drinks my blood dwells in me and I in him. As the living Father has sent me and I live on account of the Father, he also who eats me shall live also on account of me. This is the bread which has come down out of heaven. Not as the fathers ate and died: he that eats this bread shall live for ever. These things he said in the synagogue, teaching in Capernaum. Many therefore of his disciples having heard it said, This word is hard; who can hear it? But Jesus, knowing in himself that his disciples murmur concerning this, said to them, Does this offend you? If then ye see the Son of man ascending up where he was before? It is the Spirit which quickens, the flesh profits nothing: the words which I have spoken unto you are spirit and are life. But there are some of you who do not believe. For Jesus knew from the beginning who they were who did not believe, and who would deliver him up. And he said, Therefore said I unto you, that no one can come to me unless it be given to him from the Father. From that time many of his disciples went away back and walked no more with him.

But not only did they walk no more with Him, they started new denominations and super-churches wherein all that was necessary to be included in the fake “body of Christ” was to say particular sentences with particular rituals in human speech which included the giving of money..just like all the other false religions that have been destroyed since the world began.

There is no difference between a naked savage with human blood on his face and feathers in his hair dancing around saying his song and a free willer “preacher” telling the congregation that they have free will and can choose to be saved by the saying of human speech, silently or out loud. They constantly tell their slaves the only enemy is a bad choice so they will not be seen as the personification of the enemy themselves.

Psalm 12:2-4 They speak falsehood every one with his neighbour: with flattering lip, with a double heart, do they speak. Jehovah will cut off all flattering lips, the tongue that speaketh proud things, Who have said, With our tongue will we prevail, our lips are our own: who is lord over us?

In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen

Notes on Luke 7

Luke 7:11-15 And it came to pass afterwards he went into a city called Nain, and many of his disciples and a great crowd went with him. And as he drew near to the gate of the city, behold, a dead man was carried out, the only son of his mother, and she a widow, and a very considerable crowd of the city was with her. And the Lord, seeing her, was moved with compassion for her, and said to her, Weep not; and coming up he touched the bier, and the bearers stopped. And he said, Youth, I say to thee, Wake up. And the dead sat up and began to speak; and he gave him to his mother.

Does that sound like something someone who formerly taught everyone that they had free will would say to a dead man? “Youth, I say to thee Wake up.” The whole purpose of speech of free willers in human speech is “to deliver information” as fodder for “choice” and worship human speech as the supposed sole authority by which such “will neutral information” can be delivered and understood. What is a dead person going to do with “choice”? The Dutch these days would have said the youth “ran out of free will” like a battery and such a thing is so evil in their eyes that they would think the best thing to happen to him is that he went ahead and died ..or in the Netherlands, asks the state to “assist him with suicide.” Does that sound like something a Roman Catholic priest would say after raping a child? “Oh by the way I’ll raise a dead person after my sexual adventures at the expense of ..whoever. ( and it will turn out the pedophile priests did NOT “draw the ethical line” at only Roman Catholic children..that Roman Catholics are empowering child predators on the larger non-Roman Catholic populace around them…) . Of course not. After trying to teach the world that “human beings have free will!” the dead are just out of luck in free willerville, ..like children in the womb around the free willers.

So something COMPLETELY different from Roman Catholicism, or Dutch legislation or the lie of human free will must be going on both then and now.

Luke 7:16 And fear seized on all, and they glorified God, saying, A great prophet has been raised up amongst us; and God has visited his people.

Why fear? Why not “happiness”? Knowing women, just how long did it take the mother to get over the fact of her sons first resurrection? What kind of tone did she take with him afterwards? Was she really glad to have him back? Because getting him back and having him back meant that every day it was thrown up in her face that her beliefs, her parental prejudices as being automatically and forever wiser than her children, her “older person worldly experience” was ..completely wrong. The son? He very likely viewed her as a child afterwards. He never got tired of hearing her trying to copy what he knew she thought was what the other women felt through jealousy and said “That’s not how it is.”? He found out that most of what the world/human speech calls love is complete nonsense and yet that was the best his mother had to offer and she afterwards never said “I wish he had left you dead?” just so she could go back to her old comfortable, common-among-women thoughts on how reality works?

They said “God has visited his people.” not, “God is going to stay with His people”. Here is another example of the reaction of people God had blessed:

Mat 8:28-34 And there met him, when he came to the other side, to the country of the Gergesenes, two possessed by demons, coming out of the tombs, exceeding dangerous, so that no one was able to pass by that way. And behold, they cried out, saying, What have we to do with thee, Son of God? hast thou come here before the time to torment us? Now there was, a great way off from them, a herd of many swine feeding; and the demons besought him, saying, If thou cast us out, send us away into the herd of swine. And he said to them, Go. And they, going out, departed into the herd of swine; and lo, the whole herd of swine rushed down the steep slope into the sea, and died in the waters. But they that fed them fled, and went away into the city and related everything, and what had happened as to those possessed by demons. And behold, the whole city went out to meet Jesus; and when they saw him, they begged him to go away out of their coasts.

In the first instance, human speech is wailing and crying in its victims, is shown to be weak and unable to control death, is afraid when God blesses them and in the second is angry at the Incarnate Word of God displaying the weakness of human speech in the presence of demons and asks the Word of God to leave after God has blessed those exact people. They all are “astonished” but immediately seek the old emotional norms, the established pecking order.It turns out that deceived people have very strong preferences about exactly how they want to be undeceived…  it doesn’t make sense but that is how they are. They can get offended in a microsecond.

Luke 7:17 And this report went out in all Judaea concerning him, and in all the surrounding country.

Human speech/anti-Christ put out the word it perfectly understood what was going on. “God sent a prophet. He has done and will do prophet/ivory tower stuff. Our speech is safe and secure ..go back to the other stuff I was saying through you. The prophets job is not to point me out as worthless, but to merely to provide fodder for more of me to be spoken. It’s ok to be amazed ..for a while.”

Luke 7:18-23 And the disciples of John brought him word concerning all these things: and John, having called two of his disciples, sent to Jesus, saying, Art *thou* he that is coming, or are we to wait for another? But the men having come to him said, John the baptist has sent us to thee, saying, Art *thou* he that is coming, or are we to wait for another? In that hour he healed many of diseases and plagues and evil spirits, and to many blind he granted sight. And Jesus answering said to them, Go, bring back word to John of what ye have seen and heard: that blind see, lame walk, lepers are cleansed, deaf hear, dead are raised, poor are evangelized;

and blessed is whosoever shall not be offended in me.

The Word of God knew what was in man. That’s why he said “blessed is whosoever shall not be offended in me.”

John 2:23-25 And when he was in Jerusalem, at the passover, at the feast, many believed on his name, beholding his signs which he wrought. But Jesus himself did not trust himself to them, because he knew all men ,

and that he had not need that any should testify of man, for himself knew what was in man.

Luke 7:24-30 And the messengers of John having departed, he began to speak to the crowds concerning John: What went ye out into the wilderness to behold? a reed shaken by the wind?

But what went ye out to see? a man clothed in delicate garments? Behold, those who are in splendid clothing and live luxuriously are in the courts of kings. But what went ye out to see? a prophet? Yea, I say to you, and what is more excellent than a prophet. This is he concerning whom it is written, Behold, *I* send my messenger before thy face, who shall prepare thy way before thee; for I say unto you, Among them that are born of women a greater prophet is no one than John the baptist ; but he who is a little one in the kingdom of God is greater than he. (And all the people who heard it , and the tax-gatherers, justified God, having been baptised with the baptism of John; but the Pharisees and the lawyers rendered null as to themselves the counsel of God, not having been baptised by him.)

God knows John better than John knows himself. John was asked if he was one of the prophets and said no. But God says he is a prophet and more. John isn’t/wasn’t concerned with “knowing himself” in some pecking order. Only that he stay faithful to God.

And those who worship human speech and who say that they have “the oracles of God” only because –they say— what they have is the oracles of God and that there is no intrinsic, fundamental holiness of the Word of God Himself..—-to them, the Word of God is a what, not a who—those people don’t want any baptism or ceremony they did not themselves make up for others. Their notion of John was “who do you think you are? We make up customs for you. You don’t make up customs for us.” They would have had to spit on their own authority and standing in the eyes of all the other human speech speakers/worshipers of antiChrist to be baptized by John.

Luke 7:31-35 To whom therefore shall I liken the men of this generation, and to whom are they like? They are like children sitting in the market-place, and calling one to another and saying, We have piped to you, and ye have not danced; we have mourned to you, and ye have not wept. For John the baptist has come neither eating bread nor drinking wine, and ye say, He has a demon. The Son of man has come eating and drinking, and ye say, Behold an eater and wine-drinker, a friend of tax-gatherers and sinners; and wisdom has been justified of all her children.

Human speech and its emotional economy among its victims makes a mystery out of what is in front of its face. Human beings in human speech love to supposedly “figure out how to feel” as a complete lifelong occupation.

Luke 7:36-50 But one of the Pharisees begged him that he would eat with him. And entering into the house of the Pharisee he took his place at table; and behold, a woman in the city, who was a sinner, and knew that he was sitting at meat in the house of the Pharisee, having taken an alabaster box of myrrh, and standing at his feet behind him weeping, began to wash his feet with tears; and she wiped them with the hairs of her head, and kissed his feet, and anointed them with the myrrh. And the Pharisee who had invited him, seeing it, spoke with himself saying, This person if he were a prophet would have known who and what the woman is who touches him, for she is a sinner. And Jesus answering said to him, Simon, I have somewhat to say to thee. And he says, Teacher, say it . There were two debtors of a certain creditor: one owed five hundred denarii and the other fifty; but as they had nothing to pay, he forgave both of them their debt : say, which of them therefore will love him most? And Simon answering said, I suppose he to whom he forgave the most. And he said to him, Thou hast rightly judged. And turning to the woman he said to Simon, Seest thou this woman? I entered into thy house; thou gavest me not water on my feet, but *she* has washed my feet with tears, and wiped them with her hair. Thou gavest me not a kiss, but *she* from the time I came in has not ceased kissing my feet. My head with oil thou didst not anoint, but *she* has anointed my feet with myrrh. For which cause I say to thee, Her many sins are forgiven; for she loved much; but he to whom little is forgiven loves little. And he said to her, Thy sins are forgiven. And they that were with them at table began to say within themselves, Who is this who forgives also sins? And he said to the woman, Thy faith has saved thee; go in peace.

And human speech said to itself through the many: “what’s this “forgive sins” stuff? It makes no sense because I can’t do it.”

But in Christ, you don’t have to be forgiven a lot to love a lot: Jesus loves the Father perfectly and completely and had no sin. You can love a lot no matter anything else if God does it through you because God is love. But those who are forgiven a lot see more of a worldly reason for that love. You cannot manufacture lots of love for God by doing evil a lot to turn it around at some point and ask forgiveness so you get “forgiven for a lot”. Cain perhaps thought that: but he was not granted forgiveness though “he sought it diligently with tears”.

Romans 9:14-20 What shall we say then? Is there unrighteousness with God? Far be the thought. For he says to Moses, I will shew mercy to whom I will shew mercy, and I will feel compassion for whom I will feel compassion. So then it is not of him that wills, nor of him that runs, but of God that shews mercy. For the scripture says to Pharaoh, For this very thing I have raised thee up from amongst men , that I might thus shew in thee my power, and so that my name should be declared in all the earth. So then, to whom he will he shews mercy, and whom he will he hardens. Thou wilt say to me then, Why does he yet find fault? for who resists his purpose? Aye, but thou, O man, who art *thou* that answerest again to God? Shall the thing formed say to him that has formed it, Why hast thou made me thus?

In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen

Remember when..

Remember when you were taught what to be happy about? When to cry? The appropriate setting and under what circumstance to laugh ..or be “outraged”? To recognize wisdom, to tell truth from lies?

If you say you do, you are a liar. No one does.

It just happens over the days and years of your life. They add up from home, church, movies, and propaganda you didn’t know was propaganda. You “have emotions” at some given time, with or without the aid of an “event”.

A thought comes, perhaps simultaneous with an event of some sort, perhaps not ..and suddenly you smile, or cry or laugh or just look into the distance past all the voices and events swirling around you at present. ( and human speech, eager to control your thoughts at all times, and having just said something to you or around you to get a given response that the most will participate in then asks ( as a mild accusation ) “what’s wrong?” on seeing your ( even temporary ) non-participation ..to which the usual reply is “Nothing.” ..and after about a hundred such episodes a voice in you counter-attacks with “What makes you think something is wrong?” ..because by then you get the distinct impression that you are being asked to conform to some sort of evil presented as a “happy” or a fake outrage and the thing that wants you to conform is vigilant to patrol its self-supposed victims. Because it is afraid. )

Remember when you thought of one experience as a success at a young age ( you got the boy to look/become interested in you if you are a girl or if you a boy, you got the girl to look/ be interested ) only later to be taught that was a bad thing to do ( but at the time you were doing what you thought your parents or an older adult meant by “go talk to that boy” or “to talk to that girl” ..go out on dates and to parties and mingle with the opposite sex..) ..and that there were advantages to your future supposed free will, empowerments so to speak, if you denounced the reaction by the opposite sex that at the time you made every attempt to provoke? If you say you do, you are a liar. It just happened and there you are.

Yet the whole time you are feeling what you are deceived is “the feelings everyone else gets to feel”, or are angry because you can’t, there was and is a very public lie going on called the Lie of Human Free Will. When you were young they told you that if you said you had free will you would get a lot of power and would be enabled to “do anything”. But that didn’t work out ..because it is a lie, not because your just bad at the use of your supposed free will.

There never was a free will except for God’s.

But the whole time the lie of human free wasn’t and isn’t working out as planned/advertised, the thought that it was really true, but somebody else’s free will actions were undermining your own was both told to you and you witnessed people who were more experienced in that ideal of supposedly having a free will accusing each other of interfering with each other’s freedom. They were/are suing each other ..accusing each other constantly of interfering with their idealized freedom and they are non-metaphorically bitter and outraged at each other not because of the actual events that took place in some distant past or even in the present; but because they are still deceived the Lie of Human Free Will is true and every time they turn around somebody else is ( according to the lie of human free will ) interfering with their idealized power and that is why they haven’t obtained their desires. They are literally killing any perceived enemy to their desire of realizing the promised/advertised power “free will” was supposed to bring them. That includes children in their womb and the people in their distant youth. The “equity”/”revenge” is to take away some future-power scenario in which the supposed free will of the idealized enemy will be disabled or handicapped and they will “know what it feels like” to be “interfered with” instead of having the unfettered idealized “free will” just “on the loose.”

Even in the lie of free will, it seems a childhood event dozens of years ago is enough to cripple the free will for life and the free will is revealed to be such a flimsy thing that the slightest wind disables it both in the past and in the present for the entire future of its usefulness.

Yet you cannot stop, even when you see these things and suddenly you stop smiling and look off in the distance past all the present voices and someone is asking “What’s wrong?” ( when they see your lack of participation for even an instant ) and you, unable to articulate the whole evil show, already know that human speech through you is going to say “nothing” in a quiet voice because it cannot allow you to escape. You just realized human speech is inadequate to help you step outside of the lie.

What I am saying to you in Christ / Word of God, is that you just realized you need something called Salvation, not “information”. And if you know you are going to get it, you just realized how God creates slow, crooked smiles that start off on one side of your mouth and spreads to the other, the deepening of the eyes in the distance and perhaps a little laugh at what is going to happen next in front of everybody that is still deceived they are “getting even” for why the advertised effects of the lie of human free will never happen for them.

I guarantee you they will NOT understand. Human speech can’t understand and God won’t let them ..yet.

And you won’t care. But you will pray for the same salvation for them.

Luke 7:31-35 To whom therefore shall I liken the men of this generation, and to whom are they like?  They are like children sitting in the market-place, and calling one to another and saying, We have piped to you, and ye have not danced; we have mourned to you, and ye have not wept.  For John the baptist has come neither eating bread nor drinking wine, and ye say, He has a demon. The Son of man has come eating and drinking, and ye say, Behold an eater and wine-drinker, a friend of tax-gatherers and sinners;  and wisdom has been justified of all her children.

Don’t laugh AT them. You can laugh in the wisdom of Christ, but remember you wanted them for friends and to have their kids play with yours. Now? Nopety nope nope nope.

 

In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen

Anti-Christ through the Roman Catholics still hating those in the womb via the lie of free will

One of the staunchest champions of the lie of human free will, whose entire false religion rest on the that lie, the Roman Catholic Church, has now subtly sought to cement even further the lie within the lie that to be a human being at all is have a free will; that the default condition of being human is having a free will. What is the clever move this time? 

To say that children in the womb “are human” BUT have no free will. What a slippery slope that one is.

First they say that you get to chose whether God is forced to save your soul or not; that God’s love for His elect is hostage to the whims of human attention span and thought. Then they say there are ‘other humans’ who do not get to chose at all. So exactly how are they still human within the confines of the lies of the Roman Catholic Church if they don’t have free will, seeing that the functional definition of being human at all within the lie of human free will is having a free will and not simply ‘the right’ to chose, but the ‘mandate’ to chose ?

from: 

Irish Bishop: Let’s Be Honest, in Abortion, the Baby Has ‘No Choice’

“Despite the “choice” rhetoric of abortion advocates, the unborn child has no voice and no choice and is at the mercy of what adults choose to do to him or her, said Irish bishop Kevin Doran in a pastoral letter released this week.

“When it comes to the right to choose, there is a tendency to forget that there is another person involved; a vulnerable person who has no choice and who depends entirely on others for protection,” wrote Doran, the bishop of the Elphin diocese. “If society accepts that one human being has the right to end the life of another, then it is no longer possible to claim the right to life as a fundamental human right for anybody.”

The very thing he is pointing out, –that the child has no choice in its own murder– is the exact point of abortionists and murders of those in comas and those who have supposedly “lost free will” in some imaginary form or manner as if they ever had it or anybody ever had it other than God. The abortionists whole point is that they perfectly understand, that they “got the point” –from the Romanists and every other free willer, Christ-hating, lying religion– that the definition of being human is supposedly to have a free will and that without a free will one is not “a human being”. The free willer, Christ-hating religions, to include Roman Catholicism, wanted to advance a lie to grow their own organization and the lie of free will was tailor made for the occasion. On the basis of supposed human free will, the fake religions got to ‘sell’ their ideology to ‘consumers’ in a marketplace based on that one lie.

So thoroughly do they rely and worship the lie of human free will that when anyone is murdered they could care less about the soul of the individual who was murdered, but only are outraged against the assault on the ‘choice’/’free will’ of the one murdered and those who remain in that lie. To murder someone in their eyes is an assault on the Temple of Free Will, not a crime against God.

Yet here they are as Anti-Christ speaks though them, according to their own lie of free will, dehumanizing those in the womb with the pretense of defending them by trying to outfox emotions in ‘other people’ they have themselves set in motion by saying “yes you cannot get out of having a free will BUT your children in the womb are human yet do not have a free will..yet.” To those deceived they have a free will, ‘the womb’ is a pre-human place, i.e. a non-human place ( except for the convenience of producing human body parts to sell to them to extend their own evil lives ) specifically non-human “because” “there is no free will there”.

Then they protest about their intentions after they have wrapped the mouths of all those around them in evil bubble gum and have no way of extricating themselves out of the lie rhetorically. Their rhetorical strategy to make everyone a slave to them has boxed them in to destroy themselves. Now they stand in dumbfounded idiocy of their own making. All their efforts have been to make everyone –say– that they all had free will so that then the emotional manipulations could begin on “how to use it properly” to empower a priest class in priest craft. Now here they are again, putting the very words in abortionists mouths to say — “you said being a human being was to have free will. Yes or no?” and now you are saying there is a human being without a free will in my womb? Which is it? We prefer the first thing you told us — if we kill the ‘fetus’ we are innocent of murder by your own definition of being a human being. We kill a ‘fetus’ we have killed a non-human by your definition of reality that you have worked day and night to make mandatory for everybody for thousands of years!”  ..and yet pretending outrage at what abortionists say and think. (!)

Thus it comes to them and all those with them:

Psalm 7:14-15 Behold, he travaileth with iniquity, yea, he hath conceived mischief, and brought forth falsehood:  He digged a pit, and hollowed it out, and is fallen into the hole that he made.  His mischief shall return upon his own head, and his violence shall come down upon his own pate.

If that wasn’t bad enough, yet again the leader of the Romanists, their “pope” is now defending child molesters …again.

from:

Pope Francis shocks Chile by accusing sex abuse victims of slander

Pope Francis has accused victims of a pedophile priest of slandering a bishop by accusing him of a cover-up of the priest’s actions.

The pope’s remarks in Chile Thursday marked a shocking end to a trip aimed at healing historic wounds from sexual abuse by priests in the country.

 

The Roman Catholic Pedophile Organization that they call a ‘church’: Spreading lies to get other people to kill their children while being aghast, aghast I say at the very suggestion, ..while covering up yet more decades of child abuse by Roman Catholic priests. They are merely one instrument in Anti-Christ’s hatred of human beings targeting the children.

Proverbs 4:19 The way of the wicked is as darkness: they know not at what they stumble.

In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen

 

If we’re doing the nuclear option…

..why not add stiffer penalties for voter fraud as a line item? The current penalties are a slap on the wrist at most, particularly for illegals.

Proverbs 6:12-14  A man of Belial, a wicked person, is he that goeth about with a perverse mouth;  he winketh with his eyes, he speaketh with his feet, he teacheth with his fingers;  deceits are in his heart; he deviseth mischief at all times, he soweth discords.  Therefore shall his calamity come suddenly: in a moment shall he be broken, and without remedy. 

Proverbs 6: 16-19 These six things doth Jehovah hate, yea, seven are an abomination unto him:  haughty eyes, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood;  a heart that deviseth wicked imaginations; feet that are swift in running to mischief;  a false witness that uttereth lies, and he that soweth discords among brethren.

In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen

The Power of God’s Word through us versus the accusation of Judging by pagans / political left

Someone having a hard day? ( which most of the time, only means they had a desire and that desire was not accomplished.)  Some young girl trying to decide whether to have an abortion at address A versus address B?

God’s response? Don’t have the abortion at all.

Satan’s response through the political left / Nazis? You’re judging!

Yet there is no judging at all.

It is the same situation with “If God told you to do something and you didn’t do it and yet you never had the power to do it all, yet He blames you for it, that wouldn’t be fair!”

The presumption is that God has the same speech as you do..the same speech it is possible to speak a lie within. But He does not.

God speaks creation as His Own Word. He is His own Word.

John 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
John 1:2 The same was in the beginning with God.
John 1:3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.

“Made by Him” is directly stating that the Word of God makes all things, to include changing the action and circumstances of one who thinks abortion a viable option simply by saying “Don’t get an abortion at all.”

Exactly as God said “Let there be light” and there was light, He says “Don’t get an abortion at all.” and those with ears to hear are blessed by God’s divine, creating command to have children.

But those God has made deaf to His word, to this hour are deceived that God,Satan and Man all have the same speech, as all pagan religions implicitly claim. Their lie of free will forces them to hope in a lie about the origins and purpose of language and to implicitly hope in a single-speechism approach to life. Not only do they do the unforgivable sin as their best/default piety, but they have set themselves up via that means to tell anyone who ever says what they do is wrong as merely “using the free will the wrong way”, as if there was a free will other than God’s at all, and as if “with” a free will, all even God can do is “suggest a different course of action”. The ‘judging’ lie makes perfect sense to them even as they really know there is something wrong with it but cannot say what it is; exactly like a blind person trying to describe his whole environment in color as well as shape and in actual meaning as well as false emotional radar. “Judging” to a free willer is simply telling someone else that they have used or are about to “use” the so-called “free will” the wrong way. Within the lie of free will, there can be no such thing as God creating obedience by act of speech else there is no free will.

Before the political left arose in its present form, the visible Church had to be corrupted with the lie of free will first. All the lies of the occultist about a “new age” because the moon lined up with some planet or other or because of heavenly signs and all that are just shorthand for “keep teaching the lie of free will and chaos will ensue”.

God says both as creating commands, one to unbelievers:

Isaiah 29:9-14 Be astounded and astonished, blind yourselves and be blind! They are drunken, but not with wine; they stagger, but not with strong drink.  For Jehovah hath poured out upon you a spirit of deep sleep, and hath closed your eyes; the prophets and your chiefs, the seers, hath he covered. And the whole vision is become unto you as the words of a book that is sealed, which they give to one that can read, saying, Read this, I pray thee; and he saith, I cannot, for it is sealed. And they give the book to him that cannot read, saying, Read this, I pray thee; and he saith, I cannot read. And the Lord saith, Forasmuch as this people draw near with their mouth, and honour me with their lips, but their heart is removed far from me, and their fear of me is a commandment taught of men;  therefore, behold, I will proceed to do marvellously with this people, to do marvellously, even with wonder, and the wisdom of their wise men shall perish, and the understanding of their intelligent ones shall be hid.

and the other to His chosen:

Mark 4:9 And he said, He that has ears to hear, let him hear.

In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen