But for all that, they can’t get out of it. So, what do you think would happen if that speech and its grammar became the new ( long ago) “way” to debate theology? The constant etiquette and “bearing in mind” never to overcome anyone’s supposed “free will” as a “rule”; that you have to un-deceive your neighbor inside of it as a subset of non-creating speech and if it doesn’t work, you’re left with the lie that you just suck at using your free will correctly and that there is nothing wrong with the speech itself.
2 languages in total reality mandate the 5 points of Calvinism
