In Christ, we went the long way around because generally, when someone asks “do Calvinists get their belief from this verse or that verse”, what immediately follows is a attempt to undermine the meaning of the words in that verse on which the supposed Calvinistic belief stands or falls. NonCalvinists do that as human speech does it through them continually as supposed “new’ or “deeper” “scholarship”. But predestination is demonstrated as a fact through out the Holy Scriptures and in our lives quite beyond the few passages in which God explicitly points it out with the word “predestinated”. So do not be deceived by fake “new scholarship” ploys to undermine particular idealized “proof texts”.
Category: debate speech and tactics
Manufactured Consent and Molinism
all you need to know about Molinism… Arminius was a Molinist Luis de Molin was a Jesuit priest, which means witch, tasked with saving the Roman Church from the Protestant Reformation. So he simply made up new doctrine to squeeze…
Trying to Prove Personal Power/Free Will to and in front of other people is slavery
–So whom you essentially work for are those who control the material assets by which you supposedly get to prove your free will ..and they know this and they know that you don’t know this, while you are pontificating about…
Answers on Reddit r/calvinism forum which were removed because the whole post was removed ..not my post but the answers God provided through me..
I make a point of pointing out when posts and answers are removed because Satan always like to say “my questions were not answered so you must not be able to..” after he has removed what was answered to make…
The human tongue is either set on fire of hell or it is not
That means there is a physical connection between every individual who is in the flesh and that human speech itself, as distinct from the Word/Speech of God/Jesus Christ is the instrument of hell. It is of course, emotionally disadvantageous to all to know this and understand this. Thus hell as distinct from the future lake of fire into which hell will be thrown, always seek to multiply words, first wondering out loud about ‘proof’, about what proof can theoretically be, about whether or not one might ‘want’ to know such a thing and what about how avoiding understanding it might make for a more worldly/emotionally balanced individual..an individual who could just go with the flow and have no anchor of the soul nor worry about such things….a person who could constantly, flippantly say no matter what God said to them: “Ha ha ha ha! That can’t be true! Other wise we wouldn’t have free will! And everyone knows we have free will! Ha ha ha ha ha!”
How to unequivocally know you are not a racist
So: you can know someone is lying and not be a racists. To call a lie a lie is honest. To say that black people and Jews would be politically bankrupt without the lie of racism and the lie of human free will is simply honest. I know that because they have the same soul as I do.
The Lie of Human Free Will and Non-creating determinism forces Greed, Avarice, Immorality and Corruption as Common Sense: Part One
The more false religions proliferate, each with its own ideal behaviors of both salvation and damnation, the more material items are necessary to have under one’s use in order to prove the ‘free will’ exists. The proofs of having a free will are universally accepted across all religions regardless of the competition between them for adherents and each violation of one false/free will based religion’s behavioral model versus another is met with condemnation with regard to idealized progress on a ‘journey to paradise’ but universal acceptance with regard to all shopping at the same stores, only each for his/her own necessary items with which to prove their own version of an ideal life lived with a ‘free will’.
Having fun with the anti-Christ in free willers at Reddit
So: God speaks and expects His Word to be done in those given ears to hear Him because of His Own power–not theirs.
There is no guilt or forgiveness except from God in Jesus Christ
God told many prophets to go and tell His people their sins. Of course, inside non-creating human speech/anti-Christ, and being well used to hunting for new accusations to feel religious to simultaneously fuel their pride in supposedly having and ‘using the ‘free’ will’ correctly’, and to find out ‘what to do and feel next’ in that non-creating, idealization of limitation and limited resources, all they can hear when God speaks, instead of receiving the gift of life, they just hear a regular old non-creating accusation asking them to do impossible things, such as regret doing and feeling what they have in the past been mandated to do and feel to get past the false accusations and feel good about themselves. Everything would be turned upside down. They are deceived they must reverse engineer their old feelings and in fact, their whole emotional paradigm and economy of trade among feelings and the supposed proper etiquette and in doing so be a disappointment to the very speech from which they constantly seek accolades and praise: they would be, in their own deceptions and being held in non-creating speech/anti-Christ “universally” condemned because they are deceived that anti-Christ/non-creating speech/human speech is the only speech there is and that Christ as the Word of God is just an abhorrent subset of the speech they already have ..that Christ is subject to anti-Christ. So God has become to them, not a Savior, but just another accusing voice with the exception of not providing a behavior as an ideal which they can successfully mimic as going along with ‘how to cleanse your conscience’ ; God has become to them the Test that they always fail and wish then, to constantly avoid. “the Word of the LORD is unto them a reproach.”
Libertarian or Arminian support of free will from the Bible?
Ezekiel 16:6 And when I passed by thee, and saw thee polluted in thine own blood, I said unto thee when thou wast in thy blood, Live; yea, I said unto thee when thou wast in thy blood, Live.
If you expect your speech to create what you say, that verse makes perfect sense and is an act of love, of life-saving by God. God gives Himself as Life as Word in Speech. If you depend on the “free will” and a notion of non-interfering speech as a medium of communicating will-neutral information of the one welting in their own blood, it doesn’t; it sounds like a harsh mockery.