God told many prophets to go and tell His people their sins. Of course, inside non-creating human speech/anti-Christ, and being well used to hunting for new accusations to feel religious to simultaneously fuel their pride in supposedly having and ‘using the ‘free’ will’ correctly’, and to find out ‘what to do and feel next’ in that non-creating, idealization of limitation and limited resources, all they can hear when God speaks, instead of receiving the gift of life, they just hear a regular old non-creating accusation asking them to do impossible things, such as regret doing and feeling what they have in the past been mandated to do and feel to get past the false accusations and feel good about themselves. Everything would be turned upside down. They are deceived they must reverse engineer their old feelings and in fact, their whole emotional paradigm and economy of trade among feelings and the supposed proper etiquette and in doing so be a disappointment to the very speech from which they constantly seek accolades and praise: they would be, in their own deceptions and being held in non-creating speech/anti-Christ “universally” condemned because they are deceived that anti-Christ/non-creating speech/human speech is the only speech there is and that Christ as the Word of God is just an abhorrent subset of the speech they already have ..that Christ is subject to anti-Christ. So God has become to them, not a Savior, but just another accusing voice with the exception of not providing a behavior as an ideal which they can successfully mimic as going along with ‘how to cleanse your conscience’ ; God has become to them the Test that they always fail and wish then, to constantly avoid. “the Word of the LORD is unto them a reproach.”
Month: January 2021
Libertarian or Arminian support of free will from the Bible?
Ezekiel 16:6 And when I passed by thee, and saw thee polluted in thine own blood, I said unto thee when thou wast in thy blood, Live; yea, I said unto thee when thou wast in thy blood, Live.
If you expect your speech to create what you say, that verse makes perfect sense and is an act of love, of life-saving by God. God gives Himself as Life as Word in Speech. If you depend on the “free will” and a notion of non-interfering speech as a medium of communicating will-neutral information of the one welting in their own blood, it doesn’t; it sounds like a harsh mockery.
Free will in everything except salvation? Not happening.
But for all that, they can’t get out of it. So, what do you think would happen if that speech and its grammar became the new ( long ago) “way” to debate theology? The constant etiquette and “bearing in mind” never to overcome anyone’s supposed “free will” as a “rule”; that you have to un-deceive your neighbor inside of it as a subset of non-creating speech and if it doesn’t work, you’re left with the lie that you just suck at using your free will correctly and that there is nothing wrong with the speech itself.
It Missed. Again!
“How can you laugh about whores and get stronger?”